Measuring resistance accurately?

AI Thread Summary
Using an ohmmeter, even if it's part of a multimeter, provides a more accurate measurement of resistance compared to relying on color codes, which can have tolerances that lead to discrepancies. The accuracy of the ohmmeter measurement depends on the precision of the fixed current and voltmeter used. Color codes can be misleading, especially for resistors with a tolerance of 5%, as they may not reflect the true resistance if the resistor has been stressed beyond its power rating. The discussion highlights that simply reading color codes is not a true measurement, akin to assuming a lightbulb's wattage based solely on its label. Therefore, the preferred method for accurately measuring resistance is using an ohmmeter.
BioCore

Homework Statement


I was wondering what method is exactly more accurate. Would using an ohmeter, that is part of a multimeter set be more accurate than looking at the color code? My guess is that the ohmeter would be more accurate even though it is not a dedicated ohmeter, but I am not sure as to how to explain why it is.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


My guess is that the ohmeter would be more accurate even though it is not a dedicated ohmeter, but I am not sure as to how to explain why it is.

Also, will the answer be different if we are discussing specifically apart low resistances and high resistances?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Resistors come in a range of tolerances 5%,1%,01% so if you have a 5% resistor the color codes could legitimately be out by 5%.

An ohmeter (wether built into a multimeter or not) passes a fixed current through the resistor and measures the voltage across it. This answer of course depends on the accurcy of the fixed current and voltmeter.

As to your last question - what would happen if the resistance of the resistor approached the internal resistance of the voltmeter?
 
mgb_phys said:
Resistors come in a range of tolerances 5%,1%,01% so if you have a 5% resistor the color codes could legitimately be out by 5%.

And it can be off by even more than that, if the resistor has ever been driven above it's power rating.

I was once a lab T.A. for an introductory electricity/magnetism course. One of the labs was to measure a resistor (I forget just how, might have been using a Wheatstone Bridge). I deliberately selected old, used resistors that did not match the color codes, measured with an ohmmeter with those measurements known only to me.

It was a real eye opener how many students altered their data to make the results agree with the color codes. Even one pair of lab partners, supposedly with the same data, coming up with different answers (one got the actual resistance, the other got the color-code value).
 
Redbelly98 said:
I was once a lab T.A. for an introductory electricity/magnetism course.
To be really evil you substitute resistors made of wood - it's fun watching them swap power supplies, meters etc...
 
mgb_phys said:
To be really evil you substitute resistors made of wood ...

LOL. But seriously folks ...

Back to the original question. Just using the color codes is not, in my opinion, a measurement. It is akin to saying you measured the power of a lightbulb by reading the "100 Watts" printed on it. That's not measuring, but taking somebody else's word for it as to what the value is.

So: the more accurate measurement, in this case, is the method that is a measurement (using an ohmmeter), and not the method which isn't a measurement (reading the color codes).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top