Measuring Slipperiness of Fluids on Inclined Planes

AI Thread Summary
To measure the slipperiness of various fluids on inclined planes, a combination of viscosity measurement and inclined plane testing is recommended. Using a viscometer, such as a capillary or plate and cone device, can provide accurate viscosity readings, which are crucial since viscosity affects lubrication performance. Conducting inclined plane tests with controlled variables, like oil volume and incline angle, can help determine which fluid allows an object to slide at the smallest angle. Additionally, measuring dynamic friction through terminal velocity may yield more relevant results for lubricated surfaces. Understanding fluid dynamics and applying models like the Reynolds lubrication equation can enhance the analysis of the experimental outcomes.
Spencerm396
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I want to test several different fluids on an inclined planes and figure out which one is the most slippery. What would be the most scientifically sound way to measure this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you studied much fluid dynamics? The issue with slowly flowing fluids isn't due to friction against the solid boundary (we usually assume there is infinite friction and that the fluid doesn't slip at all), it is all about the fluid's viscosity, which is basically a measure of its ability to slip over itself.

This can be measured with a viscometer.
 
No, I have not. I'm interested in particular with what seems to be lubricated friction. Specifically motor oils. I was thinking about lubricating a surface and performing the standard inclined plane test to see which one causes the object to move at the smallest angle?

Dos this make sense or would you still suggest the viscometer.
 
Ah, I didn't realize it was for lubrication. I'm not sure to be honest, there is probably some good literature out there which describes standard testing for oils. But what you suggested makes sense, as long as you can ensure the volume of oils and particulars of the apparatus are kept constant, it sounds like a reasonable test.

Perhaps you might also try to keep the incline constant and drag the upper plate with a rope/pulley/weight combination, then measure the terminal velocity? That would give you a dynamic friction measurement, rather than a static friction measurement (which I think might depend very sensitively on the initial conditions and not be particularly relevant for lubrication, which is mostly concerned with moving parts).

I'm certain viscosity will be directly related to any results, but your approach seems far more practical.
 
Mikey W is certainly spot on. But might I recommend a slightly modified approach. Measure the viscosities of the oils in a standard viscometer, such as a capillary viscometer or a plate and cone device. Or better yet, see if you can look up the viscosities of the oils in the literature. Temperature will be a factor, since viscosity is often sensitive to temperature. After you know the viscosities, see how the result of the inclined plane experiments correlate with the viscosities. Better yet, develop a fluid mechanics lubrication model to calculate in advance what to expect from the inclined plane tests.
 
Chestermiller said:
Better yet, develop a fluid mechanics lubrication model to calculate in advance what to expect from the inclined plane tests.

The "standard" model is the Reynolds lubrication equation. http://www2.imperial.ac.uk/~ajm8/M3A10/lub.pdf (or google for other references).

But you will need to learn quite a bit of fluid dynamics, and math, before it makes much sense.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top