Measuring Speed Decay - Calculating Time to Stop

AI Thread Summary
To measure the speed decay of a rolling ball, one can record the time it takes to travel fixed distances multiple times. With these time measurements, it's possible to calculate the initial speed and analyze the data to determine deceleration. Curve fitting techniques, such as polynomial fitting, can be employed to model the motion based on the collected data points. Additionally, using video or stroboscopic methods can provide visual data to enhance accuracy. The goal is to derive a formula that predicts how far the ball will travel based on initial measurements.
phutoo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was wondering how I would find the speed decay of a ball rolling in a straight line, if i were to measure the time it takes to travel a certain distance over and over. i.e
Code:
[FONT="Courier New"]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
<---10cm--> <---10cm--> <---10cm-->
           ^           ^           ^
      record time  record time  record time

So then with those 3 time measurements (or less), could the time be calculated for when the ball will stop? This is just a question I've been thinking about for a couple of days and I just can't figure it out :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'd end up with 4 samples of position versus time to work with. You could then use this information to do a curve fit, perhaps a polynomial, or you could assume some specific equation type and do an exact fit.
 
Last edited:
If the ball happens to be going fairly quickly, a TV movie could show you the separate images of the ball at successive 1/60th second intervals (or whatever frame rate you happen to be using.)
Failing that, a stroboscope with, say 1/10s flashes and a camera set to long exposure (dark room, of course) could also give you a set of sharp images on the same picture. Do the whole thing in front of a metre rule and all the info (times and distances) is there on the picture for you
 
Yes but the problem is I want to be able to calculate the distance it will travel just from a few measurements at the beginning.

I'm not too sure about what you said rcgldr; how would I fill in the rest of the curve?

I was thinking from the first time measurement, I would have time and distance, so I could calculate the speed at that point to be dist / time. But then how could I calculate the de-celeration? or am I going about this all wrong? :)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top