Measuring the wavelength and position of a photon

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum uncertainty in the position of a photon given a wavelength measurement of 6000 x 10^-10 m with a precision of one part in a million. The relationship between momentum and wavelength is established using the equations p = h/lambda and deltaP * deltaX > h/4pi. The uncertainty in wavelength (deltaLambda) is calculated as 6 x 10^-13 m, which is then used to derive the uncertainty in energy (deltaE) and subsequently in momentum (deltaP). Finally, the minimum uncertainty in position (deltaX) is expressed as h/(4pi * deltaP). The calculations and relationships presented are deemed correct for solving the problem.
zing478
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A wavelength measurement gives Lambda= 6000 x 10^-10m with an accuracy of one part in a million. What is the minimum uncertainty in the position of the photon?


Homework Equations


deltaP*deltaX > h/4pi

p = h/lambda


The Attempt at a Solution


In order to solve, I know deltaP has to be expressed in terms of deltaLambda. Delta lambda is (6000 x 10^-10)(1 x 10^-6) = 6 x 10^-13.

delta P = dp/dLambda * deltaLambda

I'm not sure how to solve this relationship to get an expression for deltaLambda, to plug back into the original

deltaX > h/(4pi)(deltaP)

Once I get the expression for momentum in terms of lambda, I think I just sub it back in and solve for deltaX.

Any help? or have I done anything wrong so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok - One has \Delta\lambda, from which one can obtain \DeltaE.

What is the relationship between E and p for a photon?
 
Well, E = hc/\lambda

From de Broglies wavelength equation,
\lambda = h/p

so here \DeltaE=\Deltapc

So to find the uncertainty in position, I have \Delta\lambda, change that to \DeltaE. From there I can get \Deltap, and

\Deltax = h/4\pi\Deltap

Where \Deltax is the minimum uncertainty in position?

Does that make sense?
 
Yes. That would do it.
 
Thanks for the help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top