Mechanical Advantage of a Lever

AI Thread Summary
A lever with a mechanical advantage of 0.5 indicates that the input force is not amplified but rather requires double the force to achieve the same output. This means that while the force is halved, the distance over which the force is applied is doubled, maintaining the principle of work input equaling work output. The relationship between force and distance in levers demonstrates that as one aspect decreases, another increases to balance the equation. Understanding this concept can be enhanced by practical experimentation with a lever. Overall, the mechanical advantage of a lever fundamentally illustrates the trade-off between force and distance.
Wolfowitz
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a lever has a mechanical advantage of 0.5 - does this mean the input force is not amplified but halved?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
wolfowitz said:

Homework Statement


if a lever has a mechanical advantage of 0.5 - does this mean the input force is not amplified but halved?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


yes !
 
If a lever has a mechanical advantage of 0.5 - does this mean the input force is not amplified but halved?
So you might wonder, "What's the advantage then, when I have to exert double the force?" Well, as is the way with simple levers, if one thing halves, something else will double. Can you figure out how we benefit here, with this type of lever?
 
Work input = Work output
(Force * distance) input = (Force * distance) output
(Force * distance) input = (force/2 * distance2) output

Distance is doubled, right?

But what, exactly, is "distance" in terms of a lever?
 
Wolfowitz said:
Work input = Work output
(Force * distance) input = (Force * distance) output
(Force * distance) input = (force/2 * distance2) output

Distance is doubled, right?

But what, exactly, is "distance" in terms of a lever?

Make one using a ruler or stick, and see if you can figure it out.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Back
Top