Mechanical device to lower a raised weight

AI Thread Summary
A design for a mechanical device to lower a raised weight slowly at a controlled rate of 0.1m/hour is being discussed. Suggestions include using an escapement mechanism similar to those found in clocks or lighthouses, which can help regulate descent. Lead-screws or screw-jacks are recommended for their smooth and consistent movement, as well as their irreversible nature, preventing faster descent under heavy loads. Hydraulic and pneumatic systems were considered but found less effective than lead-screws. The device can be powered by a clockwork or weight-activated source to achieve the desired functionality.
suryag
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to design a small machine that lowers a raised weight slowly. For example if i raise the weight by 10 metres and allowed there it should start descending at 0.1m/hour. Initially i thought of a windup mechanism but i don't know how to control the rate of descent with a windup mechanism. Btw, i can't use any electrical energy.

TIA Surya
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Try an escarpment mechanism like that of a clock or lighthouse motor maybe.
 
Sardonicus has a good approach there. As to the actual hoisting (de-hoisting?) mechanism, I have a strong preference for lead-screws, or screw-jacks, or whatever they're called in your area. I have toyed with hydraulics, pneumatics, and even a few "ics" that I made up myself... but I've never found anything that provides a smoother consistent movement than a lead-screw. They also have the advantage of being irreversible. No matter how heavy the load is, it cannot force itself down faster than the screw is calibrated for. The screw mechanism can involve an escapement as Sardonicus mentioned, or an intermediate gearbox. Both approaches will work fine with a clockwork or weight activated power source.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top