Mechanical Energy: Kinetic & Potential Energy Balance

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolves5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The total mechanical energy of a system is constant when only conservative forces are present, but it is not necessarily split equally between kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy. The discussion highlights that kinetic energy and potential energy can vary independently at different points in a system, particularly in projectile motion. A counterexample, such as a projectile at the peak of its trajectory, illustrates that kinetic and potential energy are not always equal. Therefore, the assumption that total mechanical energy is always split equally is incorrect. Understanding the relationship between kinetic and potential energy is crucial for solving related problems effectively.
wolves5
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
1. The total mechanical energy of a system:

a. is split equally between kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy.
b. is constant as long as only conservative forces act on it.
c. is either only kinetic energy or only gravitational potential energy at any given time.
d. cannot be determined for most naturally occurring systems.

For this question, I think the answer is A. This is because Total Mechanical Energy is eqaul to Potential Energy + Kinetic Energy. Is my reasoning right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, you're proposing that KE is always equal to PE?
 
Yes..isnt that right?
 
In all the projectile problems that you've worked on, was potential energy always (at all times) equal to kinetic energy? Even, for example, when a vertically launched projectile is at the top of its trajectory?
 
Oh no it wasnt the same. So since its not split equally, it would be C then?
 
wolves5 said:
Oh no it wasnt the same. So since its not split equally, it would be C then?

I think that you should reflect on the problems that you've done involving PE and KE and try to draw logical arguments for accepting or rejecting the provided choices. Remember, a single counterexample disproves a proposition.

I'm not going to answer your question for you by eliminating or confirming them one at a time when you say something like, "Is it C?" :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top