How Do You Calculate Mechanical Energy Lost Due to Friction on a Slide?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mechanical energy lost due to friction on a slide, the correct approach involves using the conservation of energy principle, where the work done by friction equals the change in kinetic and potential energy. The initial potential energy (U1) at height h1 and the kinetic energy (K2) at height h2 must be properly accounted for. The error in the initial calculation stemmed from incorrectly applying the energy equations, specifically in the order of subtraction for kinetic and potential energy. The final result should reflect the positive value of energy lost due to friction, correcting the sign of the work done by friction. Properly applying these principles will yield the accurate energy loss due to friction.
bbreezy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 27.0 kg child slides down a long slide in a playground. She starts from rest at a height h1 of 17.00 m. When she is partway down the slide, at a height h2 of 7.00 m, she is moving at a speed of 7.50 m/s. Calculate the mechanical energy lost due to friction (as heat, etc.).


Homework Equations



I used mg(h1)-mg(h2)+.5mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I inputted 27(9.81)17-27(9.81)(7) and got 2648.7 and added it to .5(27)(7.5^2) which was 759.375 and came up with the answer 3408.075 J.. this seems to be wrong.. What am I doing wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bbreezy said:

Homework Statement


A 27.0 kg child slides down a long slide in a playground. She starts from rest at a height h1 of 17.00 m. When she is partway down the slide, at a height h2 of 7.00 m, she is moving at a speed of 7.50 m/s. Calculate the mechanical energy lost due to friction (as heat, etc.).

Homework Equations



I used mg(h1)-mg(h2)+.5mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I inputted 27(9.81)17-27(9.81)(7) and got 2648.7 and added it to .5(27)(7.5^2) which was 759.375 and came up with the answer 3408.075 J.. this seems to be wrong.. What am I doing wrong here?
Let K be kinetic energy and U be potential energy. In a perfect world, we have

K_1 + U_1 = K_2 + U_2

But in an imperfect world, there will be a change in the sum of kinetic and potential energy, and a simple way to account for that change is to blame it on friction. Thus,

W_{FO} = K_2 - K_1 + U_2 - U_1 = \Delta K + \Delta U

with W_{FO} being the work of friction done to the object. It will be negative, but your answer should be positive due to the phrasing, so change its sign.

You seem to be doing K_2 - K_1 and U_1 - U_2, causing your error.
 
  • Like
Likes PaperAirplane
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top