Mechanically Oscillating Capacitor in LC circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around modeling a series LC circuit where one capacitor plate is attached to a spring. Two methods for modeling the system are proposed: using a second-order differential equation for the spring's motion related to the force between charged plates, and applying a similar approach for the LC circuit with charge as a function of plate distance. The complexity arises from the relationship between plate separation and spring motion, complicating the equations. Insights suggest that the force can be modeled as proportional to charge density, while also allowing for displacement-dependent forces. The challenge remains in accurately determining the resonant frequency of the combined system.
thebaron
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have been thinking about a scenario in which I might have a series LC circuit, but where one plate on the parallel-plate capacitor is attached to a spring. How would I model such a scenario, and how would I determine the ideal resonant frequency of the entire system?

I have attempted two methods:

1) Basically take a homogeneous second-order differential for any spring, and equate it to a "driving" force equal to the force between two charged plates as a function of the distance between them;

2) And to take the homogeneous second order differential for any LC circuit, and equate it to the charge on any capacitor as a function of the distance between the plates.

My problem in case one is that the distance between plates is in fact equal to the amplitude of the spring's motion minus its actual position, quantity squared; and I simply have no idea where to begin solving that. The second attempt certainly looks less complex, but the distance between plates in that case is in fact equal to the entire solution to a homogeneous spring equation, which just makes it as complex as case one.

As for the resonant frequencies, my intuition wants to say that if the circuit and spring w's are equal that should represent total system resonance; but then, that seems too simple considering the differential models I just delineated. Any insights?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where the plate separation is sufficiently small compared to the length of the sides, the force will not depend upon the distance between the plates. The force will be directly proportional to the charge density on a plate, or equivalently, the total charge.

If you want the force to depend upon displacement, that's OK too, and has a physical analogy such as the force between two conductive spheres.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top