Medical Imaging System Design - Standards?

AI Thread Summary
Engineering students designing CT or fluoroscopy systems must adhere to specific engineering and safety standards related to their physical structure and mechanisms. A forum user suggests utilizing Google to search for relevant safety standards, indicating that many resources are available online. The discussion emphasizes the importance of thorough research in identifying applicable standards. Participants encourage leveraging search engines for efficient information gathering. Understanding these standards is crucial for ensuring safety and compliance in medical imaging system design.
yodnnee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Forum,

I am an engineering student from Melbourne Australia and I have a simple question related to a literature research project I'm currently undertaking, hopefully someone can help me out.

Which engineering or safety standards would a design for a CT or fluoroscopy system, more specifically the physical structure and mechanisms of the systems, have to meet?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
yodnnee, Welcome to Physics Forums!

Here we have a saying: "Google is your friend." We mean by that many questions (like yours) may be answered using the Google Search engine.

Using the search terms "CT or fluoroscopy system safety standards" I saw many standards, both engineering and safety. Try it.

Bobbywhy
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top