Programs Medical Physics PhD or MSc: Which Degree Offers Better Job Opportunities?

AI Thread Summary
When applying to graduate schools for Medical Physics, the choice between a PhD and an MSc significantly impacts job market opportunities and residency prospects. A PhD is generally viewed as advantageous for securing residency positions, especially since many programs combine residency and post-doctoral research, making PhD holders more appealing. While it is possible to obtain a residency with an MSc, the competition is fierce, and recent data shows that many MSc graduates struggle to secure residency positions. For instance, in one program, only a fraction of MSc graduates were offered residencies, with others opting for junior physicist roles or still seeking employment. A residency is essential for certification exams, and without ABR certification, job prospects in the field may diminish, particularly in clinical settings. Prospective students are advised to prioritize CAMPEP-accredited programs to enhance their chances of success in the field.
penofguino
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am applying to graduate schools this fall for Medical Physics. I will be hoping to get accepted into an accredited school.

I was wondering if there is a large difference in the job market depending on whether I would get a PhD or MSc in the program. Either way I would still need a residency, right? Would the PhD give me the upper-hand on getting into the residency program I would want? I have read different view on this topic, but I just wanted another opinion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my experience PhDs are more competative for residency programs.

Something that perhaps isn't advertised as much as it could be is that many residency programs are actually residency/post-doc positions where the resident is expected to move a research project forward in addition to the clinical training that is provided. PhD holders are generally more attractive for such positions.

That's not to say you can't get a residency with an MSc. Nor are you guaranteed one with a PhD.

As far as whether or not you need a residency - they're necessary if you want to write your certification exams. And while in some areas it's still possible to move into a junior physicist position straight out of graduate school, for anyone who is a student now, I would be aiming to get into a residency program.
 
There were seven people who graduated in my medical physics class with M.S. degrees.

2 were offered residency positions and took them
1 was offered a residency position but took a junior physics job instead
3 took junior physics jobs (this includes me)
1 person is still looking for work a year later, unfortunately

From the 6 people that graduated with M.S. degrees in the class after mine:

3 took residency positions
1 continued on to PhD studies
2 are still looking for work

I personally applied to a number of residency programs, interviewed for two positions and lost both of them to Ph.D. applicants. I was a very strong M.S. applicant (4.0 GPA undergrad and graduate) with strong research and clinical experience.

And I agree that you will need to do a residency if you intend to actually work in this field. A physicist without ABR certification (unless they are currently working towards it) will not be hireable in coming years unless they decide to work in industry instead of cancer care.

Also, give strong preference to CAMPEP-accredited graduate programs in your search.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
396
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top