Medium level calculation of center of mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the center of mass using integration methods for different shapes. For part (a), the user employs linear density to find the mass of a circumference and seeks confirmation on the approach. In part (b), surface density is used to calculate the mass of a disk, with a suggestion that this is correct if referring to a hemispherical shell. The conversation also touches on the choice of coordinate systems, noting that while spherical coordinates are easier, Cartesian coordinates can also be used effectively with the right trigonometric substitutions. Overall, the focus is on verifying integration methods and coordinate system choices for the calculations.
eileen6a
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




~

Homework Equations



integration

The Attempt at a Solution


for a) i use linear density and calculate the mass of circumference and integrate it bottom to top. is it riight?any other methods?
for b) i use surface density and calcuate the mass of disk and intergrate bottom to top is it right?any other methods?

also do i need to use spherical coordinate? is it exceedinly difficult to use cartisian?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi eileen! :smile:

erm :redface:where did the question go? :confused:
 
why disappear? the file as attached thx~
 

Attachments

hi eileen! :smile:

(wouldn't it have been quicker just to type the question? :confused:)
eileen6a said:
for a) i use linear density and calculate the mass of circumference and integrate it bottom to top. is it riight?

correct in principle, but difficult to say whether you're actually doing it right without seeing the calculation :wink:
for b) i use surface density and calcuate the mass of disk and intergrate bottom to top is it right?any other methods?

if by "disk" you mean "hemispherical shell", yes

and there's no other method that uses (a)
also do i need to use spherical coordinate? is it exceedinly difficult to use cartisian?

spherical is easier, but Cartesian will also work, so long as you know your trig substitutions for the integral :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top