Meissner effect and future application to the hoverboard -- Ideas?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a project involving magnetic levitation for a hoverboard based on the Meissner effect and superconductivity. Key considerations include surface and board materials, maximum load, hovering height, and the operational duration of the superconductor before overheating. The project faces challenges in obtaining proprietary information from existing hoverboard developers. There is a debate about the necessity of incorporating probability into the project, with some participants questioning its relevance to the exact calculations of the Meissner effect. The conversation emphasizes the need for optimization and anticipating unexpected challenges during the project's execution.
Oussama
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
New member has been reminded to post schoolwork in the Homework Help forums and show more work
I'm working on a project of magnetic levitation of the lexus hoverboard
Which is based on Meissner effect and suprconductivity and I have to look for contraint, probability, choice, and optimization in this project, i really find a little bit tough where to start this, so if anyone have any idea could help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you check how they did it? That should directly lead to some questions about the surface material, the board material, the maximal load, the hovering height, how long it runs before the superconductor gets too warm, and similar things.
 
Yes i wanted to get some information from them but they said thise ingormation are not for public. However, My plan now is to compare supraconductors materiaks to choise the bedt if them, search how they the magetic floor under the hoverboard, etc , But my problem is that i didn't where to put probability, because as you know Meissner magnetic field is an exact calculation.
 
Why do you want to "put probability" anywhere?
 
As i said in my project i have to talk about many things, and one of them is probability and the unexcpectable in your project that's mean for example what could be unexpected during the experience or in real time so we can avoid it and try to get to optimization
 
I don't understand your post.

Who says that you have to include probabilities of what, where? If you didn't set that as goal yourself, what exactly was the phrasing of the problem statement?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top