Mercury was indeed used as a preservative in vaccines, primarily in trace amounts, to prevent bacterial growth during production. However, after its removal from vaccines, autism rates did not decline, indicating that mercury was not responsible for the increase in autism cases. The dilution process further reduced the concentration of mercury in the final vaccine formulations. Current evidence shows no link between mercury in vaccines and neurological or psychiatric disorders.
#1
jamesb-uk
69
0
Was mercury used as a preservative in vaccines, and if so, in what doses, and is there any evidence that this caused increased numbers of neurological/psychiatric disorders?
Yes, it was. I don't know what doses, but for the last question, the fact that autism cases didn't drop after they stopped using it suggests that it wasn't what was causing the recent increase in autism cases.
The mercury that used to be used in vaccines was only in trace amounts. It was added earlier in the production process to prevent bacterial growth, but then the whole lot was much further diluted for working concentrations actually used in the vaccines.
There is no evidence that it contributed to any neurological/psychiatric disorders when it was used.
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.
According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription.
Related article -...
I just read about a pandemic of "sleeping sickness" aka Encephalitis lethargica from 1915 to 1926; cause unknown!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encephalitis_lethargica
Encephalitis lethargica is characterized by high fever, sore throat, headache, lethargy, double vision, delayed physical and mental response, sleep inversion and catatonia.
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional.
On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...