Merry Go Round Effect - Understand its Physics & Answer Daughter

  • Thread starter Thread starter donbcg
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of a merry-go-round and the concept of angular momentum. When the daughter shifts her body towards the center, the RPM increases due to the conservation of angular momentum, similar to a figure skater pulling in their arms. However, moving back to the original position should not change the RPM, as no external energy is added to the system. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how mass distribution affects rotational speed. The explanation emphasizes that while body movement can influence perceived speed, it does not inherently alter the RPM without external forces.
donbcg
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Gentlemen,

Your humble science intelect required.

My daughter and I were riding a merry go round recently and as we were spinning she realized that if she pushed her upper body to the center and back out agian the rpm increased and we spun faster.

I am a PLC/PC programmer and haven't the best way to answer her. I was ashamed simply and would appreciate the correct answer.

Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I can only explain it when she moves her body to the center that it will increase, but when she moves her body back to where she started you should be going the same speed. This is due to the conservation of angular momentum, like when a figure skater is spinning like a top and they open their arms they slow down due to more mass being further away from the center.

But moving her body directly from the inside to the out shouldn't actually change your RPM... Unless you push against the ground or something else, you're not adding any energy into the system.

But I could be missing something! :)
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top