Metamerism (vector-matrix representation of color perception)

nao113
Messages
68
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
I want to explain metamerism by using vector-matrix representation of color perception. So, here, there are 2 conditions where the both objects produce the same color with illuminant spectrum A, and the both objects produce the different color with illuminant spectrum B
Relevant Equations
in the picture below
For the illuminant A

Screen Shot 2022-06-22 at 13.01.31.png

for the illuminant B
Screen Shot 2022-06-22 at 13.01.37.png

Did I got them correct? Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nao113 said:
Homework Statement:: I want to explain metamerism by using vector-matrix representation of color perception. So, here, there are 2 conditions where the both objects produce the same color with illuminant spectrum A, and the both objects produce the different color with illuminant spectrum B
Relevant Equations:: in the picture below

For the illuminant A

View attachment 303155
for the illuminant B
View attachment 303156
Did I got them correct? Thank you
You are much more likely to get help with this if you take the trouble to define the variables and functions. If they’re standard within the topic, perhaps you can provide a link.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top