Method of Sections: Frame vs. Trusses

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krazer101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
AI Thread Summary
The method of sections can be applied to frames, but it is only effective if the structure consists entirely of two-force members. If the connections between members are fixed in both rotation and translation, the method may not yield accurate results due to the presence of moments. In such cases, analysis of each member individually or more complex methods like finite element analysis may be necessary. The method of joints similarly requires the assumption of two-force members to be valid. Therefore, careful consideration of the structure's characteristics is essential for accurate force analysis.
Krazer101
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to use method of sections on a frame or only on trusses? I have a frame that opposes a horizontal load and to find the forces in each member, I used method of sections. Is this right or is the only way to solve the forces is by analysis of each member.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
When you say frame, do you mean the connection points between each member are fixed in both rotation and translation (e.g. they are moment connections)?
 
Method of sections only works if your structure is entirely composed of two-force members. This also holds true for the method of joints. If your structure contains moments or the assumption of only two-force members is not valid, then neither method will work and you will need to look at more complex methods (finite element).
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top