Metric Tensor Questions: Understanding Hartle's "Gravity" Example 7.2

narfarnst
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi. This is example 7.2 from Hartle's "Gravity" if you happen to have it lying around.

Metric of a sphere at the north pole
The line element of a sphere (with radius a) is dS^{2}=a^{2}(d\theta^{2}+sin^{2}\theta d\phi ^{2})
(In (\theta , \phi ) coordinates).
At the north pole \theta = 0 and at the N. pole, the metric doesn't look like a flat space, dS2=dx2+dy2.
Using the coordinate transformations: x= a(\theta cos \phi , y= a \theta sin \phi show that the metric g_{\alpha\beta} = (1-2y^{2}/(3a^{2}) | 2xy/(3a^{2}, 2xy/(3a^{2}) | 1-2x^{2}/(3a^{2}) )

Where g_{\alpha\beta} is suppose to be a 2x2 matrix.

The book tells you that you rewrite \theta=1/a \sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}} , \phi = tan^{-1}(\frac{y}{x})
And then use taylor series to expand and keep the first few terms. But it doesn't show the work.

I get the idea, but I'm not sure how the math works out.
So what I'd want to do is, from \theta and \phi, find d\theta and d\phi, and then plug them into the line element.
But I have two questions.
1. How do I find d\theta and d\phi.
2. How do I go from that line element to a 2x2 matrix? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For 1., you want to use

<br /> \theta=1/a \sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}} , \phi = tan^{-1}(\frac{y}{x})<br />

to write

d\theta = \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x} dx + \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y} dy,

with an analogous expression for d\phi. This will give you a 2x2 system of equations that you can solve for dx,dy to rewrite the line element.

For 2, note that

<br /> dS^{2}=a^{2}(d\theta^{2}+sin^{2}\theta d\phi ^{2}) = \begin{pmatrix} d\theta &amp; d\phi \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} a^2 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; a^2 \sin^2\theta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} d\theta \\ d\phi \end{pmatrix}

If you go through the trouble to express the results of part 1 in vector form, it might make computing the metric a bit faster.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top