MHD Energy Equation: Comparing Formats

  • Thread starter Thread starter MasterD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Mhd
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison of two formats of the energy equation in MHD, specifically equation 2.10. One format presented is \(\frac{\rho^\gamma}{\gamma-1}\frac{D}{Dt}\left(\frac{p}{\rho^\gamma}\right)=-L\), while the other is \(\frac{dp}{dt}+\gamma p\nabla\cdot\mathbf{v}=-L\). Participants clarify that the second equation assumes constant density, which is not the case in this context. The convective time derivative \(D/Dt\) is acknowledged as \(\partial/\partial t + v \cdot \nabla\). The conversation highlights the nuances in interpreting the energy equation formats in MHD.
MasterD
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Is this the right format of the energy equation (equation 2.10)?

http://www-solar.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~alan/sun_course/Chapter2/node3.html#energy

<br /> \frac{\rho^\gamma}{\gamma-1}\frac{D}{Dt}\left(\frac{p}{\rho^\gamma}\right)=-L<br />

I know it in a different format:

<br /> \frac{dp}{dt}+\gamma p\nabla\cdot\mathbf{v}=-L<br />

Where is the difference coming from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MasterD! :smile:

Isn't your second equation the case for ρ = constant (and with D/Dt being the convective time derivative, ∂/∂t + v.)?
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi MasterD! :smile:

Isn't your second equation the case for ρ = constant (and with D/Dt being the convective time derivative, ∂/∂t + v.)?

Thanks for your reply Tim. \rho is not constant, however.. D/Dt is indeed the convective time derivative.
 
Back
Top