Solve Millikan Experiment Homework: Calculate Mass of Bearing

AI Thread Summary
To solve the homework problem of calculating the mass of a single ball bearing using twelve cans, one must first determine the mass of the cans after excluding the empty one. The smallest mass difference identified was 2.3 g, but verification is needed to ensure all can masses are multiples of this value. If discrepancies arise, exploring smaller increments like half or a third of 2.3 g is suggested to find a consistent mass. Accuracy in measurements is crucial, with a recommended error margin of ±0.05 g, which can affect the calculated mass of the bearings. Ultimately, experimenting with the provided masses while considering measurement errors may reveal a suitable mass for the bearings.
rkimbel
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are given twelve cans (one of which is empty) which are filled with a certain number of ball bearings. Using nothing more than a balance, calculate the mass of a single bearing


Homework Equations


Total Mass=Mo+n(mo)
Where total mass=mass of ball bearings
Mo=smallest mass
n=number of bearings
mo= mass of each bearing

The Attempt at a Solution


I realize the equation above is a little confusing (formatting in PF is not easy). The way I attempted this problem was by first trying to organize the mass of the twelve cans (after subtracting the mass of the empty can, of course). I found the smallest difference between two masses, which was 2.3 g. From this point, however, I'm not sure what to do. I could possible divide each mass by 2.3 g, giving me the theoretical number of ball bearings. But I don't see how I could verify my answer. Any help is appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably have the answer with 2.3 g. Do check to make sure all the can masses (less empty can mass) are multiples of 2.3. If not, try half of 2.3, then a third of 2.3 until it works.

Millikan continued looking for smaller charges for 20 years before publishing your results!
 
The problem I was having, however, was dealing with error. Assuming the mass is 2.3 g, then these cans have a lot of balls in them (up to 50). 2.3 g does not go into each mass evenly, but that doesn't mean I should look for a smaller number (right?). Obviously, 0.1 g would be a factor of each but that's not correct.
 
Yes, some judgment about accuracy is certainly needed! Just thinking ...
The numbers are given to one decimal place, so an accuracy of plus or minus 0.05 g on the given measurements is suggested. If one of the cans measures 25 g, we could note that 24.95/2.3 = 10.8 and 25.05/2.3 = 10.9, so 2.3 g is not a possible marble mass. But the 2.3 g comes from subtracting two numbers that are each +/- .05, so it could be out by up to .1 g and 25/11 = 2.27 g is a possible marble mass.

Maybe playing around like this with all the given masses would turn up a marble mass that works to within the error in measurement. Curious, if the accuracy of measurement is really +/- .05 then the LARGEST can mass yields the finest suggested marble mass because the error gets divided by a large number of marbles. Usually you get a % error - but I don't think you do with mass balances.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top