Minimal angle of deviation through the prism

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimal angle of deviation (δm) of light passing through a prism, using the index of refraction (n) and the inner angle of the prism (Φ). The formula derived for δ is δ = 2*arcsin(n*sin(Φ)) - Φ, which connects these variables. There is a query regarding the rounding of results and significant figures, particularly whether x = 43.84 should be expressed as x = 43 ± 0.02. The importance of considering error bars for Φ and n is emphasized, as δ depends on both variables. The thread concludes with the original poster indicating they have resolved their questions independently.
diracdelta
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Minimal angle of deviation δm of light after passing through prism is connected with index of refraction n and inner angle of prism Φ:

7D%7B2%7D%5C%20%28%5Cphi%20+%20%5Cdelta%20_%7Bm%7D%29%7D%7Bsin%5Cfrac%7B%5Cphi%7D%7B2%7D%7D.gif


If index of refraction and inner angle of prism are directly measured, determine minimal angle of deviation,
n=(1.52 ± 0.04)
Φ=(30 ± 0.02)°

The Attempt at a Solution


When having dependent variables, we use formulae x=F(a,b,c,...)

x(medium) =F(a(medium), b(medium),...)
plus forumulae for uncertainty.

My question here is, how to express delta as a function of phi and n?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, n * sin ( phi ) = sin 1/2 ( phi + delta )
arcsin (n* sin (phi) = 1/2 ( phi + delta )
2 * arcsin ( n* sin(phi))= ( phi + delta )
=> delta = 2*arcsin (n*sin (phi )) - phi

idem there other way?
i assume this one is correct tho
 
diracdelta said:
well, n * sin ( phi ) = sin 1/2 ( phi + delta )
arcsin (n* sin (phi) = 1/2 ( phi + delta )
2 * arcsin ( n* sin(phi))= ( phi + delta )
=> delta = 2*arcsin (n*sin (phi )) - phi

idem there other way?
i assume this one is correct tho
That's the way!
 
one more question.
i got result in a problem i.e.
x= 43.84
Mx = 0.01559

now, when i round it to one significant is this correct;

Mx= 0.02
x= 43

x = (43 +- 0.02)
 
or x = 40
 
diracdelta said:
one more question.
i got result in a problem i.e.
x= 43.84
Mx = 0.01559

now, when i round it to one significant is this correct;

Mx= 0.02
x= 43

x = (43 +- 0.02)
Not sure I can answer that question. I would have said x = 43.84 +/- 0.02 but I don't know the background.

OK, I didn't see the error bars on φ. and n. I thought you just wanted nominal δm.

Realize that φ and n are independent variables. δ depends on the material's n and on the prism angle φ.
So you need dδ as a function of dφ and dn. What would that be? (Hint: dδ is an "exact differential" of φ and n.)
 
I appreciate your help, but i solved it, the rest, by myself. thanks. :)
 
Back
Top