Minimum distance to avoid collision using relative motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum distance required to prevent a collision between two cars moving towards each other with different velocities and retardations. The initial solution using equations of motion yields a minimum separation of 225 meters. However, an alternative approach using relative motion results in a calculated distance of 150 meters, raising questions about the validity of this method. Participants discuss the implications of one car stopping first and how that affects relative acceleration and distance calculations. The confusion stems from whether the 150 meters is sufficient once one car has stopped, given that the other continues to travel.
cr7einstein
Messages
87
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



2 cars with velocities 10 m/s and 20 m/s are traveling in opposite directions, having uniform retardation of 2m/s^2 and 1m/s^2 respectively. Find minimum separation between them such that they don't collide.

Homework Equations


$$v^2=u^2 + 2as$$
$$V_{12}=v_{1}-v_{2}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


It can easily be solved by finding the distance they require to come to a stop using equations of motion, and adding them up, i.e. $$d_{min}=\frac{v_{1}^2}{2a_{1}} + \frac{v_{2}^2}{2a_{2}}$$. This gives, upon substituting, $$225 $$metres as the answer, which is correct.
The problem is, I want to do it using relative motion. Suppose 1st car is moving along positive X axis towards right, and car 2 towards left. In frame of 2nd car, $$v_{12}=v_{1}-(-v_{2})=v_{1}+v_{2}=20+10=30 m/s$$. Similarly, acceleration of car 1 must be towards left (opposite to velocity) and towards right for car 2. Thus, $$a_{12}= -3m/s^2$$. Now, in frame of car 2, car 1 comes in with a velocity 30m/s and retardation (-3)m/s^2. In order to avoid collision, it has to cover the distance between them such that its velocity upon reaching 2 becomes zero(the distance here is the minimum distance), i.e. $$v_{12f}=0$$. Using $$v^2=u^2 + 2as$$, we get $$(0)^2=(30)^2+2(-3)(x)$$, which on solving gives
$$x=150m$$.
I don't understand what is my mistake. Please point it out. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which car stops first? What happens to the relative acceleration then?
 
@DEvens, Do you mean to say that after one of the cars stop, the relative acceleration changes? Well it does but then does it mean that the 150m I get is valid only until one of the car stops, and the other still travels 75 more metres?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top