Minimum Electric Potential Difference Required to Bring Alpha Particle to Rest

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mspike6
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum electric potential difference required to bring an alpha particle to rest after its decay from plutonium-239 to uranium-235. The initial approach incorrectly equated force and energy, which was clarified as a misunderstanding of physical principles; instead, the conservation of energy should be applied. The correct method involves equating the initial kinetic energy of the alpha particle to the work done by the electric force, leading to the use of the formula V = ΔE/q to find the potential difference. After recalculating with the correct values, the final potential difference was determined to be approximately 2.43 million volts. The participants confirmed the importance of using proper physics principles in such calculations.
Mspike6
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hey..

i got this question in a unit assessment test... i solved it (or atleast i think so :P ) but the answer doesn;t make sense . so i want someone to tell me if i did something wrong.

A plutonium-239, is initialy at rest, undergoes an alpha decay \, to produce a uranium 235 nucleus. the uranium-235 nucleus has a mass of 3.90*10-25 Kg, and moves away from the location of the decay at speed of 2.62 *105 m/s


Determine the minimum electric potential difference that is required to bring the alpha particle to rest.
Marks will be awarded based on the physics principles you provide, the formulas you state, the substitutions you show, and your final answer. (12 marks)


Solution:
To bring the alpha particle to rest, we must apply Electric Force equal to the alpha particle’s Kinetic energy.

qE= ½ mv2 –(1)

V=E/q
E= Vq –(2)

Substitute (2) into (1)

Vq2 = ½mv2
V= ½ mv2/q2

m=6.65*10-27Kg
q= 3.2*10-19 C

V= 2.3*1021 V
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mspike6 said:
Solution:
To bring the alpha particle to rest, we must apply Electric Force equal to the alpha particle’s Kinetic energy.

No, here is the error. You can't equate two *different* physical quantities to each other. Saying that 'force = energy' is just as nonsensical as saying that 'time = distance.'

What must actually be true is that all of the particle's kinetic energy is transformed into electric potential energy. I.e. Initial kinetic energy = final potential energy. This problem is about conservation of energy.

Equivalently, if you were to say:

*Work done* by electric force = change in kinetic energy,

that would be fine. In fact, the work done and the change in potential energy will just differ by a minus sign. Saying that work = energy is fine, because these are the *same* type of physical quantity (measured using the same units).
 
Ya, what you say makes perfect sense, i don't know how did i do sucha mistake..

okay let's say that i got Delta E, which is Work done, But then where do i go ? can i use V=E/Q to get V ?

Thanks a lot mate, really appreciated. :P
 
Mspike6 said:
Ya, what you say makes perfect sense, i don't know how did i do sucha mistake..

okay let's say that i got Delta E, which is Work done, But then where do i go ? can i use V=E/Q to get V ?

Thanks a lot mate, really appreciated. :P

Hmm, yeah, basically, I think that's what you do. You need to know the charge of an alpha particle.
 
Ok, i solved it but i hope i got it right this time!

First: Conservation of momentum.

Mv initial = mv Duaghter pa. +mv Alpha pa.

mv Duaghter pa. =-mv Alpha pa

(3.90*10-25)(-2.62 *105) = the momentum of the duaghter particle...the negative on the speed indicate that it was moving in the opposite direction.

=-1.02*10-19

mv alpha particle = 1.02*10-19

V= 1.02*10-19 / 6.65*10-27 = 1.53*107

1/2(m)(v2) = 7.78*10-13

Delta E = 1/2 mv2 (Since it will bring it to stop)
Delta E= 7.78*10-13
V=Delta E /q

V= 7.78*10-13 / (2(1.60*10-19))

V=2.43*106



I really hope this is correct :D

Thanks guys
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top