Minumum electron energy and microscopes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum electron energy required to resolve an atom's dimensions using an electron microscope. The resolving power is limited by the wavelength, necessitating a wavelength of about 10 pm for a 100 pm atom. The participant initially misapplies the photon energy equation E = hc/λ, realizing it is not suitable for electrons. They seek clarification on using momentum and DeBroglie's equation to find the correct kinetic energy for electrons. The conversation emphasizes the need for proper equations to calculate electron energy in microscopy applications.
Firecloak
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The highest achievable resolving power of a microscope is limited only by the wavelength used; that is, the smallest item that can be distinguished has dimensions about equal to the wavelength. Suppose one wishes to "see" inside an atom. Assuming the atom to have a diameter of 100 pm, this means that one must be able to resolve a width of, say, 10 pm.

(a) If an electron microscope is used, what minimum electron energy is required?

Homework Equations



E = hc/λ
λ = h/p (DeBroglie wavelength)
p=sqrt(2mK) Momentum
Δλ = (h(1-cos θ))/mc Compton Shift

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried the equation E = hc/λ = (6.63e-34)(3e8)/(1e-12) = 1.24e6 eV, but that isn't the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E = hc/λ is for photons, not for electrons. What's the equation that gives an object's kinetic energy in terms of its momentum?
 
p=sqrt(2mK)

So, do I use that equation in conjunction with DeBroglie's? λ = h/p This one is used for electrons, right?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top