Miscellaneous Geometrical Optics Questions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two geometrical optics problems involving a plano-convex lens and a point light source in a liquid. For the first problem, the refractive index of the lens is derived using the lens maker's equation and focal lengths, resulting in a value of μ = 13/20, which raises questions about its validity. The second problem involves calculating the rate of change of the visible area at the surface of a liquid as a point source moves upward, with discussions on the relationship between the radius of the illuminated circle and the depth of the source. Participants express confusion over the conditions for total internal reflection and the correct application of optical principles in both scenarios. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding the behavior of light in different mediums and configurations.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have two problems-

1) A plano-covex lens is silvered on its plane-side and then it acts like a concave mirror of focal length 20cm. When the convex side is silvered it acts like a concave mirror of 7 cm focal length. What is the refractive index of the lens?

2) A point source is placed in a tank filled with a liquid of refractive index √2, at its bottom. Now it starts moving in vertically upward direction with a velocity of 1m/s. The rate of change of visible area at the surface, when source is at 2m from the upper surface of liquid will be?


The Attempt at a Solution



1) 1/F = 2/fl
Given that F = 20cm
so fl = 40cm

Using the lens makers equation,
We get 1/40 = (μ-1)(1/R)

Now using the second condition,
1/F = -1/fl1
here F = 7cm
So fl1 = -7cm
R = -14cm

Substituting this in the first equation we get μ = 13/20 which is weird :|

2)
attachment.php?attachmentid=30920&d=1293553033.jpg



Let r and h be the radius of the circle illuminated and depth of the source resp.
The rate of change of area at any instant dA/dt = 2πrdr/dt
How do I find a relation between r and h when refractive index is given??

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • op.jpg
    op.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 634
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the lens makers equation,
We get 1/40 = (μ-1)(1/R)

So R = 40(μ-1)

In the second case, focal length of the lens is f = R/(μ-1) and focal length of mirror is fm = R/2.
Hence 1/F = 2(μ-1)/R + 2/R = 2μ/R

1/7 = 2μ/40(μ-1)
Mow solve for μ.

In the second problem, when the total internal refraction take place, r/h = tanθ remains constant. Now 1/μ = sinθ . So θ = 45 degrees. So at any time r = h, and r^2 = h^2/(μ^2 - 1). Now take the derivative to find dr/dt.
 
rl.bhat said:
In the second case, focal length of the lens is f = R/(μ-1) and focal length of mirror is fm = R/2.
Hence 1/F = 2(μ-1)/R + 2/R = 2μ/R

There is no convex lens in the second case- the light enters from the plane side, refraction takes place, gets reflected from the silvered convex side, refracts at plane side and emerges out.

So the equation should be 1/F = 1/∞ + 1/fm + 1/∞
where fm = R/2

rl.bhat said:
In the second problem, when the total internal refraction take place, r/h = tanθ remains constant. Now 1/μ = sinθ . So θ = 45 degrees. So at any time r = h, and r^2 = h^2/(μ^2 - 1). Now take the derivative to find dr/dt.

I don't understand why will the total internal reflection take place. The question doesnot mention anything about it.
 
Abdul Quadeer said:
There is no convex lens in the second case- the light enters from the plane side, refraction takes place, gets reflected from the silvered convex side, refracts at plane side and emerges out.

So the equation should be 1/F = 1/∞ + 1/fm + 1/∞
where fm = R/2

When you silver the convex surface of the Plano convex lens, the system behave like the combination of Plano convex lens + concave mirror + Plano convex lens. The equation you have written represents the combination of rectangular glass slab + convex mirror + rectangular glass slab which is not true.


Abdul Quadeer said:
I don't understand why will the total internal reflection take place. The question doesnot mention anything about it.
The source inside the tank emits the light in all direction. But as you have shown in the diagram, all the light is not coming out of the surface of the tank because of the total internal reflection. The area of the circular patch of light depends on the depth of the source of light from the surface.
 
Thank you very much !
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top