Modeling I-V Characteristics in LTSpice

AI Thread Summary
To model the I-V characteristics of diodes in LTSpice, a DC sweep from 0 to +2 volts in 0.01-volt increments is recommended, with a 0.1-ohm resistor to observe current flow. For accurate forward characteristics, set the vertical axis maximum current to 100 mA with 10 mA ticks, achieving a cut-in voltage around 0.7V. To display breakdown voltage characteristics, a sweep from -100V to +2V can be performed, but LTSpice may not show reverse conduction without adjustments. Users can modify the diode model by editing the 1N914 description to include breakdown voltage parameters and restarting LTSpice for the changes to take effect. For reverse breakdown, utilizing a Zener diode is suggested as a more effective approach.
crono1009
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to model the I-V characteristics of a few diodes in LTSpice. Though doing the DC sweep I have in the picture doesn't seem to give me what I want. I'm sweeping from -80V (It's breakdown is 75V) to 2V, in 1V increments.

What kind of simulation do I have to run across the diode to get a nice curve representing the I-V characteristics of a diode?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Diode IV.jpg
    Diode IV.jpg
    12.6 KB · Views: 4,647
Engineering news on Phys.org
Make the resistor 0.1 ohms. Vary the voltage from 0 to +2 volts in steps of 0.01 volts.
View the current in the diode.

Run the simulation then left click on the vertical axis and set the maximum current to 100 mA with 10 mA ticks.

This gives a fairly good version of the forward characteristic.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the tips. I am happy with my cut-in voltage, around 0.7V where it should be.

Though I'm having another dilemma, I want to display my breakdown voltage characteristics also. The breakdown voltage of my 1N4148 diode is 75V. So I swept my DC voltage source from -100V to +2V in 0.01V increments, though as you can see from my graph my diode does not conduct in reverse bias at all.

Any thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • Diode IV.PNG
    Diode IV.PNG
    9.6 KB · Views: 3,370
LTSpice does not seem to use maximum ratings although they are listed in the diode characteristics. I couldn't see anywhere to turn this on.

I started a trace at -1000 volts and a 75 V diode did not conduct until it was forward biased. It was also able to conduct hundreds of amps where this was unlikely in practice.

If you want a reverse breakdown, try using a Zener diode. LTSpice has quite a few of them.

Use very small steps like 0.01 volts and remove the 1 K resistor because that affects the shape.
 
I had a play with this.

Go to
c:\Program Files\LTC\LTspiceIV\lib\cmp\standard.dio
and in the description for the 1N914 edit the text to add "bv=75" after Cjo

Restart LTSpice and reload the simulation.

The simulation now includes a breakdown at -75 volts.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top