Modeling Soccer Ball Flight Path with Drag and Magnus Forces | Extended Essay"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grantismo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Modeling
Grantismo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For my Extended Essay I am modeling the flight path of a soccer ball under various conditions. Currently, I have a model for an extremely basic soccer kick with no spin and only gravitational forces, with no drag. My goal is to model the kick firstly with the addition of Drag forces and finally with the addition of the Magnus force.

Homework Equations


Basic Projectile Flight in a vacuum on Earth(v=km/hr):
x=(5v/18)Cos\varthetaSin\betat,
y=(5v/18)Cos\varthetaCos\betat
z=-4.9t^{2} + (10 v/36)Sin\varthetat

Drag Force:
F=-(1/2)pv^{2}CdA
(on an additional note, what units should be used for these variables?)

The Attempt at a Solution


Initially I attempted to model the situation like this:
x=-(1/4m)p((5v/18)Cos\varthetaSin\beta)^{2}CdAt^{2}+(5v/18)Cos\varthetaSin\betat,
y=-(1/4m)p((5v/18)Cos\varthetaCos\beta)^{2}CdAt^{2}+(5v/18)Cos\varthetaCos\betat
z=((-(1/4m)p(-9.8t+(5v/18)Sin\vartheta)^{2}CdA)-4.9)t^{2} + (5v/18)Sin\varthetat

As I was looking for an appropriate drag coefficient for a soccer ball, I learned about the phenomenon known as Drag Crisis, where as the Reynolds number increases, the drag coefficient drops. Hence, I would need some sort of mathematical representation of this drop as a function of velocity in order to accurately model the flight path. I am simply asking for some help to this effect, whether it is resources or an actual function. Any help would be appreciated.

I am modeling this situation using Mathematica, so if anyone wants the code or actual file, I would be more than happy to provide it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know \vec{v} and F_{drag} is not a constant during the flight, do you?

There are two major conceptual errors I notice in your solution,
First, you separated the x, y, and z component. The drag force (F_{drag}) is not a linear combination to \vec{v}_x, \vec{v}_y, \mbox{ and } \vec{v}_z. You have no reason to separate them into 3 independent component.
Secondly, you didn't address the fact that the direction and magnitude of F is changing with respect to time t.

:-p
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top