Modern Physics - Invariability of Newton's 2nd Law under a GT?

PFStudent
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the form of Newton's Second Law is invariant under:
(a). a Galilean Transformation (GT) in 1-Dimension.
(b). a Galilean Transformation (GT) in 2-Dimensions.
(c). a Galilean Transformation (GT) in 3-Dimensions.

Homework Equations


Newton's Second Law.
<br /> {{\sum_{}^{}}{\vec{F}}} = {m{\vec{a}}}{\,}{\,}{\text{[N.II.L.]}}<br />

GT for 1-D
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}<br />

<br /> {{y}^{\prime}} = {y}<br />

<br /> {{z}^{\prime}} = {z}<br />

<br /> {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}<br />

GT for 2-D
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{{v}{\left({\frac{x}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}<br />
<br /> {{y}^{\prime}} = {{y}-{{v}{\left({\frac{y}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}<br />
<br /> {{z}^{\prime}} = {z}<br />

<br /> {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}<br />

GT for 3-D
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{{v}{\left({\frac{x}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}+{z^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}<br />
<br /> {{y}^{\prime}} = {{y}-{{v}{\left({\frac{y}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}+{z^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}<br />
<br /> {{z}^{\prime}} = {{z}-{{v}{\left({\frac{z}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}+{z^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}<br />
<br /> {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure exactly where to begin here. Particularly, how to proceed in the: 2-D and 3-D; cases since I have extra variables to deal with in those GT equations.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How would you proceed in the 1-D case?
 
Hey,
Gokul43201 said:
How would you proceed in the 1-D case?
Well, in the 1-D case we are only considering motion along one axis, where {\vec{v}} is a constant, hence the following Galilean Transformation,
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}<br />

<br /> {{y}^{\prime}} = {y}<br />

<br /> {{z}^{\prime}} = {z}<br />

<br /> {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}<br />

So, my guess is that by beginning with the following,
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}<br />

I can proceed as follows,
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}<br />

<br /> {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\Bigl[{{x}^{\prime}}\Bigr]}} = {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\Bigl[{{x}-{vt}}\Bigr]}}<br />

<br /> {{\frac{d{{x}^{\prime}}}{dt}}} = {{\frac{dx}{dt}}-{v}}<br />

<br /> {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\left[{\frac{d{{x}^{\prime}}}{dt}}\right]}} = {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\left[{{\frac{dx}{dt}}-{v}}\right]}}<br />

<br /> {\frac{{{d}^{2}}{{x}^{\prime}}}{d{{t}^{2}}}} = {{\frac{{{d}^{2}}{x}}{d{{t}^{2}}}}-{0}}<br />

<br /> {\left({{a}^{\prime}}\right)} = {\left({a}\right)}<br />

<br /> {{a}^{\prime}} = {a}<br />

So, I guess by showing that,
<br /> {{a}^{\prime}} = {a}<br />
this implies that N.II.L. is invariant under a (1-D) Galilean Transformation? If so, why?

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
Hey,

Any help on this, still not sure if I'm on the right path here.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top