Moment at Two Ends of Beam: Understanding Variations and Direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter chetzread
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Moment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the differences in moment distribution in cantilever and pinned beams. In a cantilever beam, a constant moment is maintained along its length due to a fixed support, resulting in a zero net moment. Conversely, in a pinned beam with couples applied at both ends, the moment varies linearly from the applied couple to zero at the opposite end because pinned supports cannot resist moments. The confusion arises from the nature of the supports and how they affect moment distribution. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing beam behavior accurately.
chetzread
Messages
798
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


in the first diagram , i notice that the moment is constant throughout the beam...

why in the second notes, for the moment 20kNm at 2 ends of beam, why the moment varies from -20kNm to 0 from one end to another end?

hbaHRJu.jpg

ii7MFar.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Which is correct? Which is wrong?
i'm confused...
another thing that i noticed is why no matter moment is clockwise or anticlockwise, the moment is always -20kNm??(as we can see ,moment is anticlockwise on the left , clockwise on the right...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chetzread said:

Homework Statement


in the first diagram , i notice that the moment is constant throughout the beam...

why in the second notes, for the moment 20kNm at 2 ends of beam, why the moment varies from -20kNm to 0 from one end to another end?

hbaHRJu.jpg

ii7MFar.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Which is correct? Which is wrong?
i'm confused...
another thing that i noticed is why no matter moment is clockwise or anticlockwise, the moment is always -20kNm??(as we can see ,moment is anticlockwise on the left , clockwise on the right...)
You can't compare beams willy-nilly. The support conditions influence how the forces and moments distribute within the beam.

In the first case, you have a cantilever beam, with the left end fixed and a couple applied at the opposite end. In order to maintain static equilibrium, there will be a constant moment present along the length of the beam, as shown in Fig. (b). The fixed end of the cantilever has a reactive couple, which combines with the applied couple to make a zero net moment for the beam.

In the other two beam cases, the beam is pinned at each end and a couple of magnitude 20 kN-m is also applied at each end. Pinned connections cannot support a moment, so the moment diagram shows the magnitude of each couple where it is applied and a zero moment at the opposite end of the beam, with a linear slope in between.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
SteamKing said:
You can't compare beams willy-nilly. The support conditions influence how the forces and moments distribute within the beam.

In the first case, you have a cantilever beam, with the left end fixed and a couple applied at the opposite end. In order to maintain static equilibrium, there will be a constant moment present along the length of the beam, as shown in Fig. (b). The fixed end of the cantilever has a reactive couple, which combines with the applied couple to make a zero net moment for the beam.

In the other two beam cases, the beam is pinned at each end and a couple of magnitude 20 kN-m is also applied at each end. Pinned connections cannot support a moment, so the moment diagram shows the magnitude of each couple where it is applied and a zero moment at the opposite end of the beam, with a linear slope in between.
why moment at the opposite end of the beam will be 0 ? why not positive 20kNm ?
 
chetzread said:
why moment at the opposite end of the beam will be 0 ? why not positive 20kNm ?
I explained that in my post.

If you are not going to read the replies to your questions, what are you doing on this site?
 
SteamKing said:
You can't compare beams willy-nilly. The support conditions influence how the forces and moments distribute within the beam.

In the first case, you have a cantilever beam, with the left end fixed and a couple applied at the opposite end. In order to maintain static equilibrium, there will be a constant moment present along the length of the beam, as shown in Fig. (b). The fixed end of the cantilever has a reactive couple, which combines with the applied couple to make a zero net moment for the beam.

In the other two beam cases, the beam is pinned at each end and a couple of magnitude 20 kN-m is also applied at each end. Pinned connections cannot support a moment, so the moment diagram shows the magnitude of each couple where it is applied and a zero moment at the opposite end of the beam, with a linear slope in between.
why not positive 20kNm ? why it's 0 ? we can see , the moment 20kNm at the left ( anticlockwise) is opposite to the moment on the right (clockwise)
 
Back
Top