Moment-beam under bending momen?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chandran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bending
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the focus is on the moment equilibrium of a beam segment under bending, specifically analyzing the forces and moments at its ends. The equation M2 - S2 - M1 + S1 = 0 is derived to maintain equilibrium, raising a question about the inclusion of M1 when considering moments about point B. It is clarified that M1 is included because it represents the effect of the force at point A, even though it acts about a different center. The conversation emphasizes that in static beam analysis, both the sum of forces and moments must equal zero to ensure stability. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate beam mechanics analysis.
chandran
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
A beam is under bending. Let us take a small part of a beam with length x. It has end A and end B. At end A the bending moment is M1 & shear force is S1 and at end B the bending moment is M2 & shear force is S2.
Let me take the moment equilibrium for this element about B.

M2-S2-M1+S1=0.

I need clarity in adding M1 in the above equation. Actually M1 acts with A as the centre. But why this is included while taking moment about B.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top