- #1

- 139

- 1

Let me take the moment equilibrium for this element about B.

M2-S2-M1+S1=0.

I need clarity in adding M1 in the above equation. Actually M1 acts with A as the centre. But why this is included while taking moment about B.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter chandran
- Start date

- #1

- 139

- 1

Let me take the moment equilibrium for this element about B.

M2-S2-M1+S1=0.

I need clarity in adding M1 in the above equation. Actually M1 acts with A as the centre. But why this is included while taking moment about B.

- #2

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 19,959

- 3,488

M is a moment or torque, which is not a force, but the effect of a force applied at some moment arm.

M has units of F-d (force - distance, e.g. N-m or ft-lbm).

In a static beam situation, the sum of the forces must = 0, and the sum of the moments = 0.

Here is a good reference on beam mechanics (statics) -

http://physics.uwstout.edu/StatStr/statics/Beams/beam41.htm#Topic 4.1 Shear Forces I

and

http://physics.uwstout.edu/StatStr/statics/

M has units of F-d (force - distance, e.g. N-m or ft-lbm).

In a static beam situation, the sum of the forces must = 0, and the sum of the moments = 0.

Here is a good reference on beam mechanics (statics) -

http://physics.uwstout.edu/StatStr/statics/Beams/beam41.htm#Topic 4.1 Shear Forces I

and

http://physics.uwstout.edu/StatStr/statics/

Last edited by a moderator:

Share: