Moment Direction: 560sin30 (0.25) Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter werson tan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Moment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the moment generated by a 560 lb force applied at a point 0.25 ft above a hinge pin. Participants clarify that the force's application point is above the hinge, which results in a counter-clockwise moment rather than a clockwise one. The misunderstanding stems from a misinterpretation of the force's position relative to the hinge. The correct analysis shows that the moment is positive, indicating a counter-clockwise rotation. Ultimately, the confusion is resolved by accurately identifying the force's location in relation to the hinge.
werson tan
Messages
183
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


why the moment 560sin30 (0.25) isn't in clockwise direction ? the horizontal component of the 560N force is directed to the left , causing the moment in clockwise direction, am i right ?
I have made my sketch beside in the diagram ...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • 95.png
    95.png
    100.1 KB · Views: 395
Physics news on Phys.org
The point of application of the 560 lb force is 0.25 ft above the hinge pin, not below as you have drawn it.
 
Mister T said:
The point of application of the 560 lb force is 0.25 ft above the hinge pin, not below as you have drawn it.
Why it can't be below the 0.25ft??
 
I don't understand your question. What I'm saying is, when I look at the figure you posted, I see that the point of application of the force is above the hinge pin.

Look at the figure. Draw a line parallel to the concrete shoot that passes through the hinge pin and call it Line P. Draw another line parallel to the first line, but passing through the point of application of the 560 lb force. Call it Line A. Those two lines are separated by a distance of 0.25 ft. Line P is above Line A. The sketch you made in the margin is consistent with Line A being above Line P. Your way means the moment of the 560 lb force is negative (clockwise). But in reality the force creates a positive moment. It will tend to make the chute rotate counter-clockwise.
 
werson tan said:
Why it can't be below the 0.25ft??
Take a line through G parallel to the chute. Follow it up to where it is near A. It passes above A, at a distance of 0.25 ft from A.
The component of the 560lb parallel to the chute acts through G, down the slope. The moment of it about A is therefore anticlockwise.
 
Mister T said:
I don't understand your question. What I'm saying is, when I look at the figure you posted, I see that the point of application of the force is above the hinge pin.

Look at the figure. Draw a line parallel to the concrete shoot that passes through the hinge pin and call it Line P. Draw another line parallel to the first line, but passing through the point of application of the 560 lb force. Call it Line A. Those two lines are separated by a distance of 0.25 ft. Line P is above Line A. The sketch you made in the margin is consistent with Line A being above Line P. Your way means the moment of the 560 lb force is negative (clockwise). But in reality the force creates a positive moment. It will tend to make the chute rotate counter-clockwise.
I said that is clockwise becoz I thought that the force is located below the 0.25m ...ok, I know my mistakes already
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top