Moment of inertia for a hollow cube. Rotating about diagonal opp corners

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a hollow cube made from aluminum square tubing, specifically when rotating about an axis through two diagonal corners. The user seeks to determine the appropriate motor size for their kinetic sculpture, expressing a lack of confidence in their mathematical skills. It is clarified that for a cube, the moment of inertia remains constant regardless of the axis orientation, provided it passes through the center of gravity. SolidWorks is suggested as a tool for calculating the moment of inertia, which can simplify the process. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these calculations for effective design and motor selection.
NastySpill
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi Folks,
I am designing a piece of kinetic scultpure that will involve cubes made from aluminium square tubing rotating around an axis that passes through two diagonal corners. I am trying to determine motor size to drive this thing, and to do that I need to know its moment of inertia.
Math is not a strong point for me AT ALL. I don't even know what the symbols in the calcualtions for determining moment of inertia simple shapes represent. So while I would like to understand the calculation I'd request that I am not bamboozled by the theory.

So let's begin. Let's say my material has a mass of Q per meter. The cube side has a length of L. Most confounding for me (as I have not found an example of this elsewhere) the axis of rotation passes through two diagonal corners.
So let's say a cube L of 1000mm and the tubing is 50mm x 50mm (not sure if this is important)

The axis of rotation is the thin light grey line in the next image..

[URL]http://fle33.com/uploads/mi_cube.jpg​
[/URL]

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me start by asking what the moment of inertia for a rod is, and how the Parallel Axis Theorem might be utilized here. Consider that six of the rods are connected to the spin axis and six are not, but all have a relative angle of arcsin((1/3)^2) to the spin axis (check me on this).

I am sorry if these concepts may be foreign to you. Perhaps someone here would be more expert at relating the details than I.

Perhaps I should first ask whether your sculpture is meant to accelerate.
 
Your right - I have no idea what your talking about..:-p
It will experience acceleration - depending on the motor drive I can fit to it. From stationary up to 360 RPM. The acceleration will be dependant on the power of the motors but does not have to be rapid.
 
For a cube (or similarly symmetrical structure), the moment of inertia is the same regardless of axis orientation, as long as the axis passes through the CofG.

I was just playing around in SolidWork and found this to be true (perhaps common knowledge here).

Should you still wish to calculate the mass moment of inertia it is much simpler than may have been expected.

360 RPM sounds kind of fast for a sculpture. Are you guarding it?
 
Certianly it'll be within a sealed enclosure.
Ok that makes sense that it is still through the cofg but ... its dimensions.. the space it revolves through are different than if the axis passed through the centre of two oppsed walls... so its moment of inertia is still the same or different?
Also given that the sides have large vancancies.. how do I do that?
Will solid works tell me the Moment of inertia? I've been considering trying the demo version.
 
NastySpill said:
Ok that makes sense that it is still through the cofg but ... its dimensions.. the space it revolves through are different than if the axis passed through the centre of two oppsed walls... so its moment of inertia is still the same or different?
Also given that the sides have large vancancies.. how do I do that?
Will solid works tell me the Moment of inertia? I've been considering trying the demo version.
The model I created showed that the mass moment of inertia for a cube or cubic structure is independent of the orientataion of the rotational axis. Wouldn't hurt for you to check with another source; I will likely do the same.
Yes, SW will calculate the mass moment of inertia of a model, though in this case, it can be calculated quite simply.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top