Moment of inertia for composite object

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a composite object with two point masses located at specified coordinates. The formula for moment of inertia, MR², is emphasized, with clarification that R is a vector whose components are derived from the axis of rotation. It is noted that moment of inertia should not be broken into components when considering rotation in a plane about a perpendicular axis, and it can be treated as a scalar in introductory physics. A participant raises a question about adjusting calculations for non-massless particles, leading to a discussion on the importance of accurately transcribing values and understanding angular momentum as an additive property. The conversation concludes with guidance on calculating the moment of inertia for each mass individually before summing them.
vetgirl1990
Messages
85
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Find the moment of inertia for this composite object:
M1=5kg at (3,4) and M2=3kg at (6,8)

Homework Equations


Moment if inertia for point particle = MR2

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure if moment of inertia should be componentized -- broken up into x and y components.
Ix =9M1 + 36M2
Iy= 16M1+64M2
Plugged in known values for m1 and m2

Now, should the components of moment if inertia now be summed (as you would if finding the total moment of inertia of say, a person sitting on a rotating disk) or I(total) = sqrt(Ix^2 + Iy^2), since they are lying in an axis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The moment of inertia is not broken into components. At least not in the context of rotation in a plane about an axis perpendicular to that plane. In introductory physics courses you will be dealing with rotation in a plane and can treat the moment of inertia as a scalar. [More generally, it is part of a tensor]

One way of thinking about this is to look more carefully at the formula MR2. The R there is a vector. It has x and y components which are offsets from the axis of rotation (or coordinate system origin). Squaring R is done by computing the vector dot product of R with itself. The dot product of two vectors can be computed by multiplying each of their respective components together and then adding up the results. So (3,4) ⋅ (3,4) = 9 + 16 = 25. The key point is that the dot product of two vectors is always a scalar.
 
jbriggs444 said:
The moment of inertia is not broken into components. At least not in the context of rotation in a plane about an axis perpendicular to that plane. In introductory physics courses you will be dealing with rotation in a plane and can treat the moment of inertia as a scalar. [More generally, it is part of a tensor]

One way of thinking about this is to look more carefully at the formula MR2. The R there is a vector. It has x and y components which are offsets from the axis of rotation (or coordinate system origin). Squaring R is done by computing the vector dot product of R with itself. The dot product of two vectors can be computed by multiplying each of their respective components together and then adding up the results. So (3,4) ⋅ (3,4) = 9 + 16 = 25. The key point is that the dot product of two vectors is always a scalar.

This is an excellent explanation, thank you! If the particles at each set of coordinates aren't massless, how would I take that into account?
Say one particle is 2kg at (3,4) and the other is 1kg at (3,4). Would I then find the dot product of the two vectors, then multiply by the total mass?
So 25(1+2)=50
 
vetgirl1990 said:
Say one particle is 2kg at (3,4) and the other is 1kg at (3,4). Would I then find the dot product of the two vectors, then multiply by the total mass?
So 25(1+2)=50
Did you transcribe those numbers properly? Both of your point masses are at the same place.

Edit: You might want to check your math as well. 25(1+2) is not usually equal to 50.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Did you transcribe those numbers properly? Both of your point masses are at the same place.

Edit: You might want to check your math as well. 25(1+2) is not usually equal to 50.
Sorry, I was typing that out on the go and being careless.
(3,4) m=1kg and (4,5) m=2kg
=(3,4)⋅(4,5) = 12+20 = 32 (1kg+2kg) = 96
 
Angular momentum is an additive property. That is to say that if you have two or more objects rigidly connected to each other then the angular momentum of the whole assembly is the sum of the angular momenta of each part taken separately. [This holds as long as you are consistent and use the same axis of rotation throughout]

So start with that. What is the moment of inertia of the first mass taken by itself? What is the moment of inertia of the second mass taken by itself?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top