Moment of Inertia for Hexagon w/ Point Masses & Length 7 cm

  • Thread starter Thread starter hellothere123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a regular hexagon with point masses at each vertex. The correct formula, I=mr^2, is applied, but confusion arises regarding the radius for each mass. One participant calculates the radius for the top and bottom vertices using the Pythagorean theorem, while others clarify that all vertices are equidistant from the center. Ultimately, the correct moment of inertia is confirmed to be 0.0294 kg·m². The conversation highlights the importance of accurately determining the radius for each mass in such calculations.
hellothere123
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a regular hexagon with sides of length 7cm has a point mass of 1kg at each vertex. what is the moment of inertia for rotation about an axis which goes through the center of the hexagon and is perpendicular to the place of the hexagon? note the sides are made of rods with negligible mass.

so i thought.. I=mr^2. so i went on to find the radius of to each mass and would sum them. but i do not get the answer. the answer by the way is .0294

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hellothere123 said:

Homework Statement



a regular hexagon with sides of length 7cm has a point mass of 1kg at each vertex. what is the moment of inertia for rotation about an axis which goes through the center of the hexagon and is perpendicular to the place of the hexagon? note the sides are made of rods with negligible mass.

so i thought.. I=mr^2. so i went on to find the radius of to each mass and would sum them. but i do not get the answer. the answer by the way is .0294

thanks.

What radius to each mass did you get?

Your method is OK.
 
well... for the top and bottom two.. i used.. sqrt[ (.07/2)^2 + ((.07/2)sqrt(3))^2 ] which is to the top corners.. so i thought it would be the same for the other corners so multiplied that by 4.

then i have the ones on the sides which would be just .07 as the radius.
 
hellothere123 said:
well... for the top and bottom two.. i used.. sqrt[ (.07/2)^2 + ((.07/2)sqrt(3))^2 ] which is to the top corners.. so i thought it would be the same for the other corners so multiplied that by 4.

then i have the ones on the sides which would be just .07 as the radius.

A hexagon is made up of 6 equilateral triangles. That means that they are all at .07 m - all 6 of them.
 
oh, haha, i see now... THANKS A BUNCH!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top