Moment of Inertia of a Rectangle

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia for a rectangle can be calculated using the integral ∫∫ρ(x^2+y^2)dy dx, with specific limits based on the rectangle's dimensions. When changing the center of rotation from the center to other points, such as a corner or the bottom edge, adjustments need to be made to the integrand rather than the limits. The correct moment of inertia formula for a rectangle centered at its origin is 1/12*M(a^2+b^2). For rotation about a different point, the distance from that point must be considered in the calculations. Understanding the axis of rotation is crucial for accurate computations.
physicskid123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to do the moment of inertia of a rectangle and I have it figured out when we have the center of the rectangle as the center of the rotation.
The equation is ∫∫ρ(x^2+y^2)dy dx where the first integral is from -b/2 to b/2 (if b is the height) and the second integral is -a/2 to a/2 (if a is the width).
I can't seem to figure out how to change the parameters of the integrals for if the rotation of the rectangle is at any other point, say a corner. Or what if it was on the bottom but still in the center of width, but the bottom of height. How do I adjust the integrals for these parameters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi physicskid123! welcome to pf! :smile:
physicskid123 said:
I can't seem to figure out how to change the parameters of the integrals for if the rotation of the rectangle is at any other point …

i] they're limits not parameters

ii] your limits are the same, it's your integrand that needs changing ! :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
i] they're limits not parameters

ii] your limits are the same, it's your integrand that needs changing ! :wink:

Thanks, I'm new to the calculus lingo. So, for example, if the center of rotation is the bottom of the rectangle (its thin btw) so the center point would be (a/2,0) if the bottom left of the rectangle were the origin, how would I do the moment of inertia for this?

I'm still solving for every dm in area dA aka dy*dx but I don't know how to make the integral work.

Also I know that my original integral works for when the center of rotation is the center of the rectangle because it gives the formula 1/12*M(a^2+b^2)=I which is the correct moment of inertia.

Here is a link that got me thinking about this: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=12903
 
hi physicskid123! :smile:
physicskid123 said:
… if the center of rotation is the bottom of the rectangle (its thin btw) so the center point would be (a/2,0) if the bottom left of the rectangle were the origin, how would I do the moment of inertia for this?

your r has to be the distance from (a/2,0)

(or, generally, from (xo,yo))

your limits will depend on where your origin is …

you can choose your origin to be at the centre, a corner, or (a,b) itself, whichever you think is most convenient :wink:
 
It would also be useful to specify not the point, but the axis of rotation, to avoid any possible confusion.
 
tiny-tim said:
hi physicskid123! welcome to pf! :smile:


i] they're limits not parameters

ii] your limits are the same, it's your integrand that needs changing ! :wink:

I think it's simpler to keep the integrand and change the limits. Both methods are possible. For instance, the the axis passes by the corner, you can simply change the limits to (0, a) and (0, b).
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top