Moment of Inertia of a Rectangle

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia for a rectangle can be calculated using the integral ∫∫ρ(x^2+y^2)dy dx, with specific limits based on the rectangle's dimensions. When changing the center of rotation from the center to other points, such as a corner or the bottom edge, adjustments need to be made to the integrand rather than the limits. The correct moment of inertia formula for a rectangle centered at its origin is 1/12*M(a^2+b^2). For rotation about a different point, the distance from that point must be considered in the calculations. Understanding the axis of rotation is crucial for accurate computations.
physicskid123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to do the moment of inertia of a rectangle and I have it figured out when we have the center of the rectangle as the center of the rotation.
The equation is ∫∫ρ(x^2+y^2)dy dx where the first integral is from -b/2 to b/2 (if b is the height) and the second integral is -a/2 to a/2 (if a is the width).
I can't seem to figure out how to change the parameters of the integrals for if the rotation of the rectangle is at any other point, say a corner. Or what if it was on the bottom but still in the center of width, but the bottom of height. How do I adjust the integrals for these parameters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi physicskid123! welcome to pf! :smile:
physicskid123 said:
I can't seem to figure out how to change the parameters of the integrals for if the rotation of the rectangle is at any other point …

i] they're limits not parameters

ii] your limits are the same, it's your integrand that needs changing ! :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
i] they're limits not parameters

ii] your limits are the same, it's your integrand that needs changing ! :wink:

Thanks, I'm new to the calculus lingo. So, for example, if the center of rotation is the bottom of the rectangle (its thin btw) so the center point would be (a/2,0) if the bottom left of the rectangle were the origin, how would I do the moment of inertia for this?

I'm still solving for every dm in area dA aka dy*dx but I don't know how to make the integral work.

Also I know that my original integral works for when the center of rotation is the center of the rectangle because it gives the formula 1/12*M(a^2+b^2)=I which is the correct moment of inertia.

Here is a link that got me thinking about this: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=12903
 
hi physicskid123! :smile:
physicskid123 said:
… if the center of rotation is the bottom of the rectangle (its thin btw) so the center point would be (a/2,0) if the bottom left of the rectangle were the origin, how would I do the moment of inertia for this?

your r has to be the distance from (a/2,0)

(or, generally, from (xo,yo))

your limits will depend on where your origin is …

you can choose your origin to be at the centre, a corner, or (a,b) itself, whichever you think is most convenient :wink:
 
It would also be useful to specify not the point, but the axis of rotation, to avoid any possible confusion.
 
tiny-tim said:
hi physicskid123! welcome to pf! :smile:


i] they're limits not parameters

ii] your limits are the same, it's your integrand that needs changing ! :wink:

I think it's simpler to keep the integrand and change the limits. Both methods are possible. For instance, the the axis passes by the corner, you can simply change the limits to (0, a) and (0, b).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top