Moment of Inertia, relation to other moments?

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia is termed a "moment" due to its mathematical formulation, which resembles that of electromagnetic (e/m) moments, involving integration of mass density multiplied by coordinates. This similarity extends to the quadrupole moment, suggesting a potential connection between mechanical and electromagnetic moments. Both types of moments represent average values of density times distance raised to a power from the center of mass. While mechanical moments use material density, e/m moments replace it with electromagnetic quantities. This discussion highlights the underlying mathematical parallels between these concepts in physics.
Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
Is there a reason the moment of inertia is called the "moment" of inertia? A while back, for whatever reason, I remembered how the moment of inertia is formulated and I realized it had similarities to the e/m moments; that is the integration of the mass density multiplied by coordinates. In particular, it looked like the quadrapole moment. Is there any connection? Was it simply a convenient name to give to e/m moments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mechanical moments (from a mathematical point of view) are average values of density times distance (raised to some power) from the center of mass of the object. The moment of inertia is the second moment.

e/m moments have a similar mathematical structure, but e/m quantities replace material density.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

How can I calculate the moment of inertia of any object?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Stiffened panel - moments of inertia
Replies
4
Views
2K
Moment of Inertia of a Square: Problem with Certain Method
Replies
12
Views
3K
Finding moment of inertia of irregular object with calculus?
Replies
3
Views
3K
Small mass element for laminar (moment of inertia)
Replies
1
Views
1K
Moment of inertia and rotational motion
Replies
11
Views
2K
Moment of inertia of a rod bent into a square
Replies
12
Views
2K
Deriving the moment of inertia of solid sphere
Replies
2
Views
3K
Finding Moment of Inertia of a wheel experimentally
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Time derivative of the moment of inertia tensor
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top