Moment of inertia tensor for a laminar

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the moment of inertia tensor for a 2D laminar object rotating about the z-axis. The user expresses confusion regarding the IXZ component, questioning why it is considered zero when the moment of inertia about the z-axis is IZZ. It is clarified that IXZ is not necessarily zero unless the object has axes of symmetry. The moment of inertia for rotation about a specific axis only considers IZZ, but the presence of non-zero products of inertia like IXZ indicates asymmetry. Understanding these components is crucial for accurately describing the rotational dynamics of the object.
jamie.j1989
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Consider a 2D laminar only rotating about the z axis, with the axis origin at the bottom left hand corner and adjacent sides coinciding with the z and x axes.

so ω = (0,0,ωz)

y = 0

I don't understand how the IXZ component is 0 to just leave the IZZ component?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There must be something wrong\int xz dAis not zero. I suppose we are talking about the inertia tensor components, however the moment of inertia with respect to the z axes is just I_zz
 
Thanks for the reply,

Sorry I didn't explain properly, I'm not getting Ixz = 0, that's what's confusing me if the moment of inertia for an object rotating only about the z axis is Izz why is Ixz non 0?
 
the expresion for the moment of inertia of an object rotating about a direcction \hat{n}=(n_1,n_2,n_3)\,\,is\,\,I_{\hat{n}}=\sum_{ik}I_{ik}n_in_k so when it rotates about the z axes only I_zz matters
 
In general, the products of inertia (Ixy, Iyz, Ixz) are zero only when there are axes of symmetry for the particular body undergoing rotation.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top