Moments and equilibrium homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem related to moments and equilibrium in physics. The user, Adam, seeks assistance in replacing a force with a single force at a specific point, having missed the relevant theory due to illness. A hint suggests calculating the distance 'x' first, which leads to a formula involving the total moments around a point. The solution indicates that the total moments equal zero, allowing for the calculation of 'x' as 0.58 meters. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding torque and equilibrium in solving such problems.
Adam@Home
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I've been here before out of geneal interest but this is my first post, so i hope it's in the right spot.

I have a problem that I need an answer to, unfortunately due to sickness i wasn't at school when we were taught the theory of moments (called torque by some).

Anyway my question: I have to replace the force shown in the diagram (below or at the URL below) with a single force at the blue dot (x meters away from the 300N force). It said as a hint we should calculate x first.

Ok, I have NO IDEA how to do this. Any help or just a push in the right direction would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance
Adam

URL of pic: http://www.geocities.com/gambleonlinecasino/question.gif http://www.geocities.com/gambleonlinecasino/question.gif
 

Attachments

  • question.gif
    question.gif
    3.1 KB · Views: 816
Physics news on Phys.org
can assume that the system is in equilibrium ?
I'm not quite sure if the 60N.m is two or just a single moment.

So to get x, take the total moment of forces around any point, then solve for x which is the length away from blue dot.
Total of moments around blue dot = -60(Nm) + 300x(sin20)(Nm) = 0
x = 0.58

My conventions are +y is up, +x is to the right, +m clock-wise.
 
Thanks for the help Taurus, very much appreciated.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top