Momentum & Impulse: Rank Greatest to Least

  • Thread starter Thread starter Justinmcg67
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the concepts of impulse and momentum in relation to crates being pushed with different forces. The user initially confuses units of impulse and force, mistakenly equating Newtons with kilograms. Clarifications emphasize that Newtons measure force, while kilograms measure mass, and that impulse should be expressed in Newton-seconds. The relationship between force, mass, and acceleration is explained through Newton's second law, reinforcing that 1 Newton is defined as the force needed to accelerate 1 kg at 1 m/s². Ultimately, the user finds clarity through tutoring, leading to a better understanding of the problem.
Justinmcg67
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Straight from book: Marshall pushes crates starting from rest across the floor of his classroom for 3 seconds with a net force as shown. For each crate, rank the following from greatest to least... (a) Impulse delivered (b) Change in momentum (c) Final speed (d) Momentum in 3 seconds.

All crates are pushed to the right...

Crate A) F=100N, M=30kg
Crate B) F=75N, M=20kg
Crate C) F=50N, M=10kg

Homework Equations



I'm using the following to try and make some sense of this...

Impulse = Δp = Force * Time = Δmv
Momentum = mv

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is where a bit of confusion is setting in for me. I use the Force * Time equation to get an impulse, for crate A I got 300N, for crate B I got 225N, and for crate C I got 150N. Now, isn't 10N equal to 1 kg? However, in a YouTube explantion, which I didn't fully understand, nor does my book make a correlation between force (Newtons) and kilograms, which I find to be quite odd; in any case, 10 N = 1 kg, however it noted that 1N = 1 kg m/s. I don't understand how you go from 10N = 1 kg to 1N = 1kg m/s?

I'm really struggling with this problem not because of equation but because I simply do not understand how I am to begin calculating this problem and what units to use. Also, I'm sure I could find speed/velocity but at this point before I start throwing numbers around and getting it wrong, a nice description of how I should approach this is what I am after. Please don't solve the problem for me, but rather if this 1N = 1kg m/s thing could be explained and how they are related I would great;y appreciate it. As it was taught that Newtons are a force and Kilograms are a unit of mass, two very different things.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Justinmcg67 said:

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is where a bit of confusion is setting in for me. I use the Force * Time equation to get an impulse, for crate A I got 300N, for crate B I got 225N, and for crate C I got 150N.

There is a problem here. You have expressed your answers in Newtons. But the Newton is a unit of force. Your results here are not forces, they are impulses. Impulse = force*time. Therefore, your answers should be in dimensions of force*time, which would have units of Newton-seconds. Always include units in your calculations, and carry them all the way through to the final step, in order to avoid these types of errors. For example, if you had written:

impulse = (100 N)*(3 s) = 300 Ns

you would have immediately seen that the units of the final answer were Ns.
Justinmcg67 said:
Now, isn't 10N equal to 1 kg?

Let me stop you right there. NO, 10 N is NOT equal to 1 kg. Not only that, but this is a completely nonsensical statement. The 10 N is a force, and the 1 kg is a mass. Force and mass are two totally different physical quantities. You cannot equate two physical quantities that are not of the same type. Saying that force = mass makes about as much sense as saying time = temperature. It's meaningless. You can only equate one quantity that is a force to another quantity that is a force, or one quantity that is temperature to another quantity that is a temperature, etc. To make sure that you don't mistakenly equate two different types of physical quantities, check to make sure that your equations are dimensionally consistent i.e. the units of the stuff on the left hand side are the same as the units of the stuff on the right-hand side.

Now, it is true that an object whose mass is 1 kg will have a weight of 10 N (9.81 N, actually) if it is on the surface of the Earth. The object's weight is a measure of the amount of force with which the Earth's gravity pulls on it. So, weight is a force. If you took that 1 kg mass and put it somewhere else, e.g. on the surface of the moon, then its weight (in Newtons) would be lower, because the moon has less gravity and therefore does not pull down on the object as hard. However, its mass would never change: it would always be 1 kg no matter where it was.

Justinmcg67 said:
However, in a YouTube explantion, which I didn't fully understand, nor does my book make a correlation between force (Newtons) and kilograms, which I find to be quite odd; in any case, 10 N = 1 kg, however it noted that 1N = 1 kg m/s. I don't understand how you go from [STRIKE]10N = 1 kg [/STRIKE]to 1N = 1kg m/s?

I crossed out the thing that you wrote that was wrong. I've already explained above why it was wrong. Now, remember from Newton's 2nd Law that force = mass*acceleration. Remember that any quantity in physics can be derived from some combination of the base quantities, mass, length, and time. So, the equation above (Newton's 2nd) tells us that the dimensions of force, in terms of fundamental quantities, are mass*length/time2. By definition, 1 Newton is the amount of force required to accelerate a mass of 1 kg at an acceleration of 1 m/s2. Therefore:

1 N = 1 kg * 1 m/s2 (definition of the Newton)
 
I ended up going to tutoring first thing in the morning and I got great explanation as how to solve the problem. Thank you very much for helping me though. :-)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top