Momentum of Astronaut Throwing Apples in Space

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how an astronaut can maximize velocity by throwing apples in space. It explores the physics of momentum, noting that throwing apples one by one yields the same velocity as throwing the entire bag, assuming the same throwing velocity. However, the conversation highlights the need to consider the astronaut's maximum force and the impulse applied to each apple, suggesting that throwing smaller pieces might not always result in greater velocity. The lack of a universal reference frame complicates the analysis, as velocities should be measured relative to an observer at rest. Ultimately, the problem is deemed vague, making it difficult to determine the best approach for maximizing velocity.
edowuks
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Astronaut is at rest in space. He has back of apples with him. How should he throw the rocks away to gain maxium velocity. (one by one, whole back, slice the apples into smaller fracments, group the apples, etc)


Homework Equations


p=mv


The Attempt at a Solution


I marked M_tot="total mass of apples"=n*m_app where m_app is mass of one apple and n the quantity of apples. When he throws the whole back (ignoring the mass of back) he gains velocity V_a=(M_tot*V)/(m_ast-M_tot) where V is the velocity he throws the back and m_ast is his mass. Now when he throws one by one he is at rest first so after throwing the momentum must be p_1=(m_ast-m_app)*V_ast1=m_appV, now when he throws second apple the momentum of system is P_1 so new momentum is P_2=(m_ast-2*m_app)V_ast2=2*m_app*V and continuing this way I get exact same velocity that I got at first since P_n=V_astn*(m_ast-M_tot)=m_tot*V.
But does it really go this easy way (I thought I needed to integrate something, but couldn,t get any equation for force), and am I thinking that velocity right. Now it is velocity relative to astronaut, should it be velocity relative to space?

Thanks for your help, and sorry my not-so-good english skills
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes you appear to have done it correctly. and your result is correct too, you should get the same result no matter how small the pieces are as long as you throw each piece with the same velocity.

there is no universal reference frame. So in this problem we would just measure their velocities relative to an observer at rest.
 
I rethought it and am I really right. I mean in that solution I have assumed that the velocity astronaut gives to one apple is same as the velocity he gives to whole bag. But is the velocity really constant, shouldn't it be impulse that is constant since astronaut is human he has maxium force he can give to apple. But thinking that way he recaives much higher velocity by throwing apples one by one, that throwing whole bag.
 
excellent point. I think the question is a little vague in this area, so it's difficult to tell.
If we assume he could throw all pieces with the exact same velocity (which is probably unlikely) then you did it correctly.

So, a better way to do it would probably be to assume the astronaut can only apply a certain force to each piece (which is more realistic). In this case each piece would have the same acceleration but different velocities.

But, it really all depends on how he throws it. If he throws the large bag but applies an impulse then his momentum will be greater. So the question is poorly worded.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top