Momentum question. Acceleration on a moving track

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of speed accumulation on a moving track, specifically a train acting as a roadway. When a train moves at 100 mph and a vehicle on it accelerates to 100 mph in the same direction, the combined speed relative to the ground would indeed be 200 mph. The analogy of running on a travelator is used to illustrate this concept of speed addition. Clarifications are made regarding the instantaneous acceleration when joining the moving train. Overall, the participants confirm the understanding that speeds can be combined under these conditions.
Berts
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've a question that is baffling me a little.

If a train was made so that it would act as a moving track / roadway and the cars were connected so as to complete a length of the track, in an oval for example. Say we accelerate the moving trackway to 100 Mph, and then a car accelerates to 100mph. Total speed = 200mph.

Now say you have a moving track on top of the railway track. Are all of the speeds combined, is it even possible? Would I imagine it would be like running on a travelator? So long as you joined the train at 100mph would you instantly accelerate to 200 mph?
It is hurting my brain and I know something in my thinking is incorrect!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Berts said:
So long as you joined the train at 100mph would you instantly accelerate to 200 mph?
How did that "instantly" come into this?
 
  • Like
Likes Berts
A.T. said:
How did that "instantly" come into this?
Ah yes I see now,

But once on the train you could then accelerate the vehicle and go 200mph...
 
Berts said:
Are all of the speeds combined, is it even possible?
I assume you mean something like this: Say a train is moving at 100 mph East with respect to the ground/track. And you, on the train, are riding a motorcycle at 100 mph East with respect to the train. (Pretend it's a long flat bed train.) Then your speed with respect to the ground will be 200 mph.

Is that what you mean?
 
Doc Al said:
I assume you mean something like this: Say a train is moving at 100 mph East with respect to the ground/track. And you, on the train, are riding a motorcycle at 100 mph East with respect to the train. (Pretend it's a long flat bed train.) Then your speed with respect to the ground will be 200 mph.

Is that what you mean?
Yes thanks :-)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top