Momentum question. Acceleration on a moving track

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of speed accumulation on a moving track, specifically a train acting as a roadway. When a train moves at 100 mph and a vehicle on it accelerates to 100 mph in the same direction, the combined speed relative to the ground would indeed be 200 mph. The analogy of running on a travelator is used to illustrate this concept of speed addition. Clarifications are made regarding the instantaneous acceleration when joining the moving train. Overall, the participants confirm the understanding that speeds can be combined under these conditions.
Berts
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've a question that is baffling me a little.

If a train was made so that it would act as a moving track / roadway and the cars were connected so as to complete a length of the track, in an oval for example. Say we accelerate the moving trackway to 100 Mph, and then a car accelerates to 100mph. Total speed = 200mph.

Now say you have a moving track on top of the railway track. Are all of the speeds combined, is it even possible? Would I imagine it would be like running on a travelator? So long as you joined the train at 100mph would you instantly accelerate to 200 mph?
It is hurting my brain and I know something in my thinking is incorrect!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Berts said:
So long as you joined the train at 100mph would you instantly accelerate to 200 mph?
How did that "instantly" come into this?
 
  • Like
Likes Berts
A.T. said:
How did that "instantly" come into this?
Ah yes I see now,

But once on the train you could then accelerate the vehicle and go 200mph...
 
Berts said:
Are all of the speeds combined, is it even possible?
I assume you mean something like this: Say a train is moving at 100 mph East with respect to the ground/track. And you, on the train, are riding a motorcycle at 100 mph East with respect to the train. (Pretend it's a long flat bed train.) Then your speed with respect to the ground will be 200 mph.

Is that what you mean?
 
Doc Al said:
I assume you mean something like this: Say a train is moving at 100 mph East with respect to the ground/track. And you, on the train, are riding a motorcycle at 100 mph East with respect to the train. (Pretend it's a long flat bed train.) Then your speed with respect to the ground will be 200 mph.

Is that what you mean?
Yes thanks :-)
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top