Monte Carlo and Inverse Monte Carlo - Good Sources for Self Study?

AI Thread Summary
Good online resources for Monte Carlo methods include Stefan Weinzierl's 'Introduction to Monte Carlo methods,' which is well-regarded. However, there is a notable scarcity of accessible materials specifically focused on Inverse Monte Carlo methods, making it challenging for learners to grasp the concepts. The discussion seeks recommendations for papers or tutorials that can effectively explain Inverse Monte Carlo to undergraduate students. Additionally, there is curiosity about whether the inquiry pertains to Monte Carlo integration or simulation techniques like Metropolis-Hastings. Overall, the thread highlights the need for more educational resources in the area of Inverse Monte Carlo methods.
Stalafin
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

Does anyone know some good sources (preferably on the Internet) for Monte Carlo and Inverse Monte Caro methods (especially the latter)?

There is plenty of stuff to find on Monte Carlo, I am particulary pleased with Stefan Weinzierl's 'Introduction to Monte Carlo methods', which can be found on the Internet.

But for Inverse Monte Carlo there cannot be found much, which is actually helpful to understand and apply the approach (well, at least not for me).

I am searching for a good paper or tutorial (or whatever I can get) on Inverse Monte Carlo methods, which explains to a 3rd semester undergrad (=> me) Inverse Monte Carlo.

If, apart from that, you guys have something nice about Monte Carlo, please point that out to me. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you just mean Monte-Carlo integration or like simulation techniques like Metropolis-Hastings?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top