More magnetic force less repulsion

AI Thread Summary
The experiment with the gauss rifle revealed that increasing the number of magnets side by side resulted in the ball traveling a shorter distance. This counterintuitive outcome suggests that while magnetic pull increased, the repulsion effect decreased due to the arrangement and distance between the magnets and the ball. The original setup of the gauss rifle, which typically uses fewer magnets in a specific configuration, demonstrated better performance. The findings challenge established theories regarding magnetic force synchronization and the efficiency of magnetic propulsion. Understanding the physics behind these results could involve examining the principles of magnetic fields and their interactions.
jtrevor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In doing a science project using the gauss rifle we changed the number of magnets side by side verses aditonal stages, The result was the ball traveled a shorter distance the more magnets used. I understand why this occurred but need scientific reason and explanation based on what laws of physics we changed to cause the result obtained.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you are not "synchronizing" your magnets properly. You are using electro-magnets firing in succession aren't you?
 
N o, it was not set up conventionally as my son wanted to change. He was told his changes were not consistent with the set up of a Gause rifle but, wanted to see what would happen. I guess that's science. He set (1) 1/4 inch magnet then increased (1) magnet on each time: (2) up to (5) magnets in contact with one another. 0 1111100. 2 1/4 inch magnets worked best as that is how the Gauss rifle was originally set up. The more magnets added the shorter the distance the repulsed ball traveled. So increased magnetic pull decreased repulsion. Due to distance between trigger and repulsed ball and magnetic force I suppose. What established theory's or science was disrupted to explain result in scientific terms?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Back
Top