Motion along a Straight Line problem

AI Thread Summary
A hiker observes a boulder falling and notes it takes 1.30 seconds to fall the last third of its distance, calculated as 8.281 meters using the formula y=(1/2)(a)(t^2). The challenge arises in determining the total height of the cliff, as the boulder accelerates due to gravity throughout its fall. To find the total distance, the initial and final velocities at the beginning and end of the last third must be calculated in relation to the distance fallen. The discussion emphasizes the need to relate these velocities to time to solve for the total distance. Understanding the relationship between distance, time, and acceleration is crucial for solving this motion problem.
ledhead86
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Motion along a Straight Line problem !PLEASE HELP!

An alert hiker sees a boulder fall from the top of a distant cliff and notes that it takes 1.30 s for the boulder to fall the last third of the way to the ground. You may ignore air resistance.

I have calculated the last 1/3 of the distance to be 8.281 m by the formula y=(1/2)(a)(t^2) where a=gravity=9.8 meters per second.
However to find the total distance of the cliff, I can't just multiply the distance of the last third times 3 because the boulder is accelerating throughout the entire distance, so how do I find the totatl distance?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For some reaosn I'm stumped right now, but I can tell you that
I have calculated the last 1/3 of the distance to be 8.281 m by the formula y=(1/2)(a)(t^2) where a=gravity=9.8 meters per second.
doesn't work because
because the boulder is accelerating throughout the entire distance
applies to this part of the problem too.
 
You only have distance moved and time to work with. And gravity of course.

Let u be the velocity at beginning of last third
Let v be the velocity when stricking the ground.

Calculate u in terms of distance fallen
Calculate v in terms of distance fallen

The distance moved has been used. Can you now relate u and v in terms of t ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top