Motion in two dimensions question. At wit's end.

AI Thread Summary
A user struggled with a physics problem involving projectile motion, specifically calculating the minimum time of flight for a projectile with an initial speed of 80 m/s to hit a target 450 m away. The challenge stemmed from the absence of an angle, leading to difficulties in eliminating variables. The solution required understanding that the projectile's ascent and descent must take equal time, prompting the user to derive equations for both horizontal and vertical motion. After receiving guidance, the user successfully solved the problem by applying trigonometric identities to find the angle. The discussion highlights the importance of combining equations in projectile motion to address variable dependencies.
Hekmat123
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Motion in two dimensions question. At wit's end.

Hi, I'll try to keep this short. I have a Physics exam tomorrow and was doing some textbook questions and can't figure out this one problem. It's killing me! I have the answer (supplied by the back of the book), but just can't seem to get there.

Some help would be much appreciated since I've grown very frustrated with it.


Homework Statement



The initial speed of a projectile is 80 m/s. If the projectile is to strike a target that is a horizontal distance of 450 m away, what is the minimum time of flight. (Answer 6.1s)

Homework Equations



Standard laws of motion ignoring air resistance and the like

X(final) = X(initial) + V(initial) (t) + 0.5at^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried everything I can think of. What's shutting me down every time is that there is no angle supplied so I'm always stuck with two variables I can't eliminate.

Obviously the answer must lie in finding the smallest angle possible for a projectile at 80 m/s to reach 450 meters, I just can't figure out how. I came up with this equation from the formula above, but I have no clue how to use it as my brain is just shutting down at this point (maybe it's useless i don't know, argh!)

450 = 0 +80(cos(alpha))t = 0
t= 5.625/cos(alpha)



If someone could help me get this problem you would earn my undying admiration, and I'll mail you a cookie!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a step back. The target is 450m away, so the time it takes to get there is what you calculated in terms of alpha. The other constraint is that the projectile has to go up for half of the flight, and back down for the other half of the flight, in order to hit the target. That up and down motion has to take the same total time t.

You'll probably get a 2nd order equation, since there are probably two answers (low angle shot < 45 degrees, and high angle shot > 45 degrees)
 
You already have an equation for the horizontal position as a function of time. Now write an equation for the vertical position as a function of time. Combine those equations to eliminate the angle and solve for the time.
 
Thanks for the help! I'm going to try it again and I'll post back, hopefully to add a solved tag , heh.
 
Finally managed it. Thanks for the help guys. All I had to do was use the sin/cos identities to solve for alpha, I feel retarded, thanks again!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top