Motion of Charged Particles in Field Uniform B-field E=0

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the motion of charged particles in a uniform magnetic field where the electric field is zero. The user seeks to determine the perpendicular velocity of the particles without relying on the Larmor radius or angular frequency. They express confusion about how to apply vector operations like cross and dot products in this context, especially without known angles. The user is engaged in a science research project and is eager to learn more about the relevant math and physics concepts despite a tight schedule. The conversation emphasizes the theoretical approach to particle motion in magnetic fields.
Eri ep
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello!

So I've been working on proving to myself different parts of https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/nuclear...a-physics-i-fall-2003/lecture-notes/chap2.pdf packet for several weeks.

Under 2.1 Uniform B field, E=0, for the Larmor Radius, I need to know perpendicular v, but I want to figure it out in terms of anything except rL and omega.


I'm especially wondering what "perpendicular velocity" would mean and how to find it. I was thinking about cross products and dot products, but what would I cross with the velocity? I also don't know any angles, because right now I have no data- I'm just trying to do theoretical and trying to avoid angles.

It's late at night, thank you for helping me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi! I also wanted to say that I'm in AP Calculus right now, and in Physics C AP. This is for my science research project, so I'm willing to put in the time and effort to learn math/physics that I don't know yet, although I am in a really big time crunch.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top