Motor Principle - Direction of Rotation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the direction of rotation for a loop of wire in an increasing magnetic field. Lenz's law is highlighted as it states that the induced current will create a magnetic field opposing the change in the external field. Fleming's left-hand rule is mentioned as a tool to find the direction of force on the current-carrying conductor, but confusion arises due to the lack of clarity on the current's direction in the diagram. It is clarified that the induced electromotive force (emf) and current depend on the rate of change of magnetic flux, as per Faraday's law, and that the loop must be positioned correctly to induce maximum emf. Overall, understanding the interplay between these principles is crucial for determining the loop's rotation direction.
fonz
Messages
151
Reaction score
5
Evening,

I'm trying to work out the direction a loop of wire will rotate about an axis in an increasing magnetic field.

From what I understand by Lenz's law the induced current in the loop will create it's own magnetic field as to counteract the change in external magnetic field. I'm struggling by Fleming's left hand rule however to determine a direction of rotation.

I have attached an image, if somebody could clear this up this will definitely put me at rest.

Motor%2520Principle.jpg


Cheers
Dan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing up a lot of physics ideas.
This is about the FORCE on a current carying conductor in a magnetic field.
Fleming's Left hand rule gives the direction of the force.
Your diagram does not show the direction of the current in the coil of wire!
You need to know that
 
technician said:
You are mixing up a lot of physics ideas.
This is about the FORCE on a current carying conductor in a magnetic field.
Fleming's Left hand rule gives the direction of the force.
Your diagram does not show the direction of the current in the coil of wire!
You need to know that

The direction of the current just affects the direction of the turning moment,not the magnitude.

Lenz's law will only come into play once the coil starts to move and will limit the acceleration.
 
technician said:
You are mixing up a lot of physics ideas.
This is about the FORCE on a current carying conductor in a magnetic field.
Fleming's Left hand rule gives the direction of the force.
Your diagram does not show the direction of the current in the coil of wire!
You need to know that

Sorry perhaps I should elaborate,

In this example what I am saying is the magnetic field shown in blue is increasing in the direction shown. Therefore an emf will be induced in the wire equal to the rate of change of this magnetic flux (Faraday's law). This emf will produce a current in the direction according to Lenz's law.

The induced current will obviously create it's own magnetic field as such to oppose the changing magnetic field (Lenz's law). It is the direction of which I am struggling to ascertain. So this loop is now carrying current and so should experience a force equal to the Lorentz Force (except the current is changing).

I am thinking about the AC induction motor where in this example the wire loop is the stator and the N-S pole is coil wound in the stator.

Thanks
Dan
 
My apologies fonz! I mis-read. Your first sentence. I thought you were looking at a coil with current flowing in it.
 
The way your diagram is drawn there is nof flux linking (going through) the loop and therefore the increasing magnetic field will not induce an emf.
If the loop is at 90 degrees to the field then the maximum induced emf (and therefore current) will be induced.
The emf is given by Faraday's law = rate of change of magnetic flux linkage and the direction of the emf and resulting current will try to prevent the change (increasing magnetic flux) occurring.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top