Motor Torque to Stabilize Inverted Pendulum

AI Thread Summary
To stabilize an inverted pendulum, the measured angle and cart position are sent to a digital controller, which outputs a force value in Newtons needed to move the cart. The challenge lies in converting this force value to the torque required at the motor. The torque can be calculated using the formula torque = force * radius of the pulley, assuming negligible friction. Clarification is sought regarding the term "force on lower side," as it seems unnecessary if only one pulley is in operation. Understanding these conversions is crucial for effective control of the system.
NeuralNet
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I am trying to stabilize an inverted pendulum with a physical system as follows:
2dtb0as.png


The measured values of the pendlums angle and the cart (runner block) position are sent to a digital controller. The digital controller then outputs a value that is sent to the motor to turn the belt pulley system which in turn moves the cart.

The problem I am having is my equations are such that the value coming out of the controller is the force (in Newtons) that needs to be applied to the cart to move it. I need to convert the force value to the torque value at the motor.

How do I do that?

I am an EE major, and don't know too much about ME stuff. Any help is much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Here is a more detailed image:
olie8.png


ADC = Analog to Digital Converter
DAC = Digital to Analog Controller
There is an amplifier after the DAC that is not show.

That u(t) value is currently the force (in Newtons) that needs be applied to the cart (not shown in the figure), I need to convert this to the torque value of the motor (as seen in the diagram).

How do I do that?
 
Last edited:
For that , I will need value of coefficient of friction. Assuming angle of contact to be 180 degrees, I can calculate torque = (force - force on lower side) * radius of pulley.
 
We are modelling with coefficient of friction to be negligible.

When you say:
torque = (force - force on lower side) * radius of pulley

What are you referring to when you say 'force on lower side'?
 
Last edited:
NeuralNet said:
We are modelling with coefficient of friction to be negligible.

When you say:
torque = (force - force on lower side) * radius of pulley

What are you referring to when you say 'force on lower side'?
isn't the torque just equal to the force require times the radius of the pulley? assuming if you are only operating one of the pulley?
 
Last edited:
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top