Mousetrap Racer - Applied Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheScienceKid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Applied Forces
AI Thread Summary
To test Newton's Second Law by varying the force on a mousetrap racer, one approach is to modify the applied force through the use of a spring, which requires measuring the spring constant. The discussion also highlights the importance of understanding how forces like friction affect the racer, although gravity cannot be altered. An example provided involves stopping a 50kg car moving at 4 meters per second, which would require a force of 100N to halt. The focus remains on how to effectively manipulate and measure the forces acting on the racer to observe their effects on motion. Overall, the conversation emphasizes practical methods for applying Newton's laws in a controlled experiment.
TheScienceKid
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Suggest a way of testing Newton’s Law by altering the force applied to your mousetrap racer."

Basically, what the question is asking for is a suggestion for a way of testing Newton’s 2nd law by varying the force on the racer.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Now, I've already tested Newton’s 2nd law by varying the mass.

But when it asks me to vary the force on the car, what does that mean exactly?

Would it be something like this:

The car has a mass of 50kg. I stop it while it is moving initially at 4 meters per second. The force applied to that would be 100N.

Or something about varying gravity and friction, since they are forces acting on the car?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you can't vary gravity. One way to modify the forces acting on the car is to attach a spring to it (you'll need to measure the spring constant).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top